Laserfiche WebLink
T <br /> that Tasks 7G, 7K 71, U and 7K were being deleted. The funds associated With those tasks were <br /> then placed into Tasks 8B and 8C to combine-with the existing-budget. ir. Klenert asked that <br /> the Proposed Amendment-Modification of Agreement for Studying a Report, Professional <br /> Services be re-read and Mr. Hall read the document. It was rated that both the Sewer <br /> Commission and the Town Manager would sign the document. <br /> Mr. Gurnee referenced the`preliminary allocation of dost to taxpayers'' in Phase 5, Task A of the <br /> original scope and inquired about its presence in the amended agreement. The Chair stated that . <br /> the original scope included a financial analyst but that now the water-Sewer District model was <br /> favored. The statement referring to Task item 8 was located in B 1. .Chairman Fudala <br /> recommended that the cross-outs in the Proposed Scope Amendment he eliminated and Mr. Hall <br /> agreed to update the document. Mr. Gobell reported that figures may be available in the summer <br /> for the waquoit Bay TMDS. The Chair requested a motion to modify the agreement with <br /> AHD, including the modified Scope of Sergces and the schedule. Mr. Malarkey expressed <br /> concern that there was no date of completion included and suggested including a recommended <br /> date of completion' . Mr. Klenert agreed but stated that the Commission was dealing With outside <br /> agencies. The Chair-agreed with the frustrations expressed but referenced an example of <br /> information submitted last summer with the results not yet available until this summer, <br /> suggesting that it was not possible to identify a deadline. Mr. Klenert inquired about GHD's <br /> timeframe to complete the work once the approvals were in place. lir. Hall indicated that he <br /> could identify each.step and time required for each of their task. Mr. Klenert recommended the <br /> development of a flow chart to be used as a visual aid. The Chair agreed and it was determined <br /> that a flow chart would be developed separate from the contract amendment. Mr. Hall suggested <br /> utilizing Microsoft'Project to develop a flow chart,which would a11ow the user to change dates <br /> as needed, and agreed to develop a chart tying in external regulatory agencies, the Sewer <br /> Commission and GHD. The Chair-recommended that the chart also be added to the website. <br /> Mr. Gurnee made a motion to accept the modification agreement from GHD and.approve <br /> the change of scopes and payment schedule as defined to the Commission through the <br /> documentation provided. Mr. Malarkey seconded the motion. 3 yes, I abstained <br /> The modification was signed by the Commissioners. <br /> Status of GHD'Tasks <br /> -MEP model runs for 3 plan options seat to SMaST-1 r-. Gregg reported his intent to follow up <br /> with Mr. Eichner at SMaS T. <br /> -Regina villa Associates public outreach work-Mr. Gregg reported that two or three sets o <br /> minutes were missing from the website. <br /> -1 E A Notice of Project Change-Mr, Gobell had completed the mailing list for the Notice of <br /> Project Change. The Chair recommended that GHD review the list. <br /> Invoices <br /> No invoices at this time: The Chair noted that the loan would be expiring soon and the <br /> Commission would be unable to make payments after April. The loan will be renewed and it <br /> was expected that payments could be made in July. <br /> Intermunicipal Issues <br /> 3 <br />