12/20/2012 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

MDIs, requ 'ng some refinements. GHD and the sever Concession will need to meet with i NEP in order to fine-tune the targets and refine the approach Mn order to develop the draft recommended plan Aernative. Chairman Fudala indicated that the three scenarios were discharge options and inquired whether cost estimates would be available for the decision making process. Mr. Gregg stated that cost estimates had been d ecl oped for the initial 5 scenarios, but suggested that the new scenarios presented a means to com' pare the scena os on an even playing field. Mr. Gregg recommended first focusing on the level of treatment needed and the discharge location before developing the costs for- mous alternatives or technologies within the one scenar'o. The Chair suggested that option 1A yielded the best results, but that Mashpee would be unable to control the actions of the surrounding towns. Mr. Klenert inquired about the most advantageous and economic option of the gree scenarios. Mr. Gregg responded that Options I and I C may offer the most favorable approaches to meet the TMDLs and most econon cal y. Mr. Gregg emphasized that the surrounding toms may take some d 1sc arge out hx t may 1e ; some discharge in7 impacting Mashpee's.plans. `here was discussion regarding addressig.,the wastewater issue on a watershed basis_ _W. Gregg noted that Mashpee could b tasked with i enti ing the best solution for XUshpee ale the other to m developed then-o an-roach. Regarding phasing and i ple mentation, Mr_ Gregg reminded the ornn ssion that although � erd Loud he a plan in pace to achieve the TN4DL-s, the plan would ever�d over a 1lgig pe o 3 /1 a t i The Y i Yf f if i i nniA l 1 ll .v �} a as i n u ti. i m n l ementati plan, �I i i nr i i �ine 4 identifying the a=reas to be targeted-along With the fiscal responsibility. Mr. Lyons asked that the �,on-umission allow 1"vlr_ Gregg to make bis reort wfthouit intentruption to prote the inte �t jr o f h„s rpor Mr. Lyons made a motion to let fir. Gregg give his presentation, make notes and then ask mie.�t ons afterward. 114r `r. u ee seconded the mot*ton fir. Klenert stated that it was a large volume of information. Commission members were in - = apt 3 forward I i1ty taken- a17 Gregg stated that feedback was needed on the three options to provide guidance to GHD. vv_l 1 be eetin —1 h P to discuss their nd �-�gs and c n-sr any ad s�ents_ G w111 a w hir7 vel pin die.-Anal alternate screenino j),a is �- �� i , ach tfing thefin ings of tile.t h ' th-ledraftanalysiji the new sctnaanos and the new rept'- . Thi' 'esu-t ?' t` doenunent '� iia LT it 1 slre- iV T3 33 by .'�' y e. a .Z3; then finalized for WPA S l�ttal_ lu OWI qu n local nen, rp t � � �� d plan�vo d be developed and "nclud treatment and d'sc urge Iocatio� At this time, negotiations ��a occurwith e�sti�Ig pr'jV§4e_ 1 # *1 f L t # s +. • # f r • • # y i�` T nt 1-4Pf t�� nt'2*rte U i� i I�A �- - # tT I��aa {�^ #*r Ti F �rtr� it F si fwcj#=_L RL s sr C■ xT is W it Wlvi_ it# A74 a Ft# F%y Twr 4�L.C+FE Li 4.1 L t F J ;-Li �'�J.t4 eLT 4+ 5 7. - k,l Li Lli X C�tL,S 4r f l li[wr ;s�y.E� as " .1- 1 {.J ' ce towns. Thle ffiro ork fof ping Mould be based on idesitiNing the rtri y ar to b arg to d -rii it clip tin 'a'* �t *'' #�i .., iia#fir s 's`�` ss F i �`+ .�`*w` # -ncy all-j, n yi�eir 3-i 'nfzf ir-Tiirg- ai Li 11I YY 1$ i 111 �S � � t 4}1 D X,-4 7i# 'hil J 3 3 1L irF l li�%iZ SS�ZS i�ri3 S�i-i'7.L3 3 z- rrs• r-sem s *# i rir*.�* €' 3l s "�I xJ'Afilo �4o"P .. * ' ULIHE., iF afi.i' comm-e W.r,� }i i �� i Vr Wi 11 th Fust � echno 4fV�lii411i% could t- en be.developed- The plan would be revievred and finalized by the Co111r i is ion and sent *, } 11 3- !i *� # til a e_1 aloniv 1 7i c ` e r� nii �� ` t eni sevAl fsrit7 F " i 7r 7 i i.+id-i f y-F i Y i it i l L }'i i•i i i 'i. 4 i J i i T }f J i s �J 4c k i Y L Tys};i s i i-&;Llabi • 4