My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/20/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/20/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 11:21:38 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 1:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/20/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4P <br /> people should be ► lling to protect their investment with a wastewater plan so that property <br /> value does not decline. Mr. Lyons supports the idea of utilizing the tax base for funding. <br /> Mark Davini suggested that there needs to be a fair and balanced distribution of the expense and <br /> he compared it to the school system. Although residents may not have students in the school <br /> system, a good system serves to improve the quality of life and property value in Mshpee. <br /> Commissioners discussed tax rates and the use of units or frontage.for betterments and discussed <br /> the fairness of homes With septic systems versus hones connected to sewer systems. Mr. <br /> Marcelli stated that residents renaming on septic systems would be required to pay the same <br /> amount as residents connected to the suer system and inquired about the possibility of changing <br /> the tax base. Chairman Fudala noted that the cost to tie in to the sewer system and sewer rags <br /> would assist in funding the system. The Chair referenced Chatham's plan to suer the entire <br /> town and place the cost on the tax base in fairness to residents, even though it was not needed to <br /> meet the T MDL. The entire town of Mashpee does not need to be sewered to meet the T AI DL <br /> but fairness could be provided by maintaining the septic systems of residents and taping over the <br /> condominium sever systems. Mr. O'Hara noted that all residents pay the Water District even if <br /> they are not hooked up to to water. There was discussion regarding the Water district tax hill <br /> and process as well as the T'own's tax rates. <br /> Mr. Klenert recommended that a straightforward approach be used to inform the public and that <br /> they be advised that all efforts are designed to protect the groundwater. Mr. Klenert suggested <br /> the possibility of adding a clean water fee to raise money for clean water preservation. Mr. <br /> KI enert added that the project may not be initiated for another 10-15 years, but that the public <br /> must be educated during that time. Chairman Fudala stated that the Sewer Commission would <br /> not have the legal authority to charge a clean water fee through the Water District. 1r. O'Hara <br /> referenced Falmouth"s efforts to fund their suer system and noted the reasonable $385 per <br /> year/per household charge in order to fund the entire system. Mr. Klenert expressed concern <br /> about increasing fees, such as in Boston. Mr. Baker noted that fees were increased in order to <br /> fund a new treatment plant and the outfall pipe. Mr. Lyons noted that with only 10,000 <br /> residents,, a small fee may be ineffective. The Chair added that legislation would be necessary to <br /> execute Mr. I lenert's suggestion. Mr.Marcedli suggested charging a nominal fee but setting it <br /> aside in a dedicated fund. Chairman Fudala stated that it was his belief that it was not legal to <br /> charge beyond the town's expenses for services in order to it set wide for future expenses. The <br /> Chair added that building the project mint start over the.next few years because the 0 interest <br /> rate funds are only available until 2019. Where was discussion about the proposed growth neutral <br /> bylaw that must be approved by Town Meeting in order to be eligible for the State Revolving <br /> Fund (SRF) loans. Where was also discussion about the benefits and challenges of growth in <br /> 1 .ia.shpee_ <br /> Regarding the Public opinion Survey, the Chair noted that respondents supported a combination <br /> of tax and betterments or betterments only. Mr_ 0"Hara noted that the survey was distributed last <br /> year and that respondents did not have access to information about the cost of the betterments. <br /> Dr. Davini suggested that respondents may have believed that they would not be faced with <br /> paying a betterment. Mr. Klenert recently inquired about the number of people currently being <br /> serviced by wastewater treatment, as well as their demographics. Mr. Baker discussed the <br /> variety of fees, such as connection fees, that could be charged with the establishment of a suer <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.