Laserfiche WebLink
Since my appointment to the Mashpee Sewer Commission,I have been concerned about <br /> the emphasis placed on centralized wastewater treatment facilities. At present, there are seven <br /> wastewater treatment plants in Mashpee: New Seabury, Southcape Village, Southport, <br /> Windchie Point,Mashpee Commons,Willowbend, and the High School. There are new ones <br /> planned for: Mashpee Village,Wampanoag Village,Cotuit Meadows, and the Haney Property. <br /> In addition the Sewer Commission has discussed three other locations: East Mashpee(near <br /> transfer station), South Mashpee(near new fire station) and West Mashpee (near the high <br /> school) This would be a total of 14 wastewater treatment plants in a town with a land area of <br /> 23.5 square miles,3.8 square miles of water and a 2010 population of 15,947, Whatever <br /> happened to onsite alternative, innovative,cost effective and politically feasible approaches` <br /> The claim that wastewater treatment plants are the only reliable means to treat <br /> wastewater is unfounded. The USEPA cited several misunderstandings to implementing more <br /> effective onsite wastewater management programs,including public misperceptions that <br /> centralized sewage treatment plants perform better,protect property values, and are more <br /> acceptable than decentralized treatment systems. Decentralized wastewater management (DWM) <br /> is defined as the collection,treatment, and reuse of wastewater at or near its source of generation <br /> and they currently serve approximately 25 percent of the U.S. population, and approximately 37 <br /> percent of new development. DWM systems have been shown to save money, to promote better <br /> watershed management since there would not be a concentration of water flow from a treatment <br /> plant greatly increasing water in an area not accustomed to such flow, and are suitable for a <br /> variety of site conditions. <br /> A prime example of the use of DWM is Calvert County,Maryland, a 30-mile long north to <br /> south peninsula that is bounded on the west by the Patuxent River and on the east by <br /> Chesapeake Day and is five to nine miles wide. It should be noted that on December 29,2010,the <br /> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency established the Chesapeake flay Total Maximum Daily <br /> Load ('I' L), a historic and comprehensive"pollution diet"with rigorous accountability <br /> measures to initiate sweeping actions to restore clean water in the Chesapeake Day and the <br /> region's streams,creeks and rivers. Calvert County has a total area of 345 square miles of which <br /> 215 square miles is land and 130 square miles is water. The 2010 population was 88,737. Of <br /> extreme importance is an email from the Division of Environmental Health of the Calvert <br /> County Health Department,which is attached. <br /> Compare that to the present plan that would require the takeover,maintenance, repair, <br /> and perpetual costs of operating all wastewater treatment plants in Mashpee which initially <br /> would run in the neighborhood of$ 00 million to$500 million plus sewer charges,repairs, etc. at <br /> a cost of tens of thousands of dollars per year, in perpetuity.It makes sense to leave existing <br /> wastewater treatment plants under their present ownership, since that was a condition for those <br /> sites to exist, and using onsite wastewater treatment for existing septic systems(out of a total of <br /> 5,256 households existing in 2010). Taking into consideration the number of septic systems <br /> remaining in Mashpee, the type of system(s)to be installed, and the financing available,the costs <br /> will be a small fraction of the total cost of any present plan regardless of which governmental <br /> entity would be responsible for the plan. You be the judge of how you want to spend YOUR tax <br /> money, as that is the only money available to anyone at any level of government. <br /> Ralph J. Marcelli <br /> Mashpee <br />