Laserfiche WebLink
agreement for a 45-day period, concluding in January, so that towns could review actual numbers <br /> to consider their options. Ten year contracts, with 5 year extensions and guaranteed tonnage, <br /> with ranges of 85%-115%, and consideration for increased recycling,were points of discussion. <br /> The SWAC group agreed to enter into an exclusive negotiation,though Mr. Tilton abstained and. <br /> Mashpee and Falmouth had not attended. The exclusive negotiation had not yet been initiated. <br /> The Chair noted that Bourne and SEMASS plans were stili unknown and he inquired about the <br /> UCRTS budget timeframe. Mr. Jack responded that he would need the figures next summer in <br /> order to plan for 2015. Ms. Laurent suggested that information should be available to take to <br /> spring town meetings. Mr. D. Barrett stated that Bourne was in negotiation but would not tip <br /> their cards. Ms. Laurent stated that, despite an exclusive negotiation, towns would not be bound <br /> to sign with SEMASS. <br /> Discussion: Waste from Other Communities <br /> Mr. Tilton reviewed the contract and found nothing that would preclude the Board of Managers <br /> from pursuing the possibility of accepting commercial waste from other communities. Ms. <br /> Laurent indicated that Mashpee would also support the possibility and that Town Counsel would <br /> review the possibility. The Chair noted that more tonnage could be accepted but questioned <br /> whether the UCRTS wanted to compete with Bourne. Ms. Laurent indicated that the transfer <br /> station had been operating at a loss, which could continue for another two years. Ms. Laurent <br /> added that the UCRTS would likely have to pay the $30,000 deficit to Mass Coastal. Mr. D. <br /> Barrett stated that although they preferred not to have competition, they were understanding and <br /> wished to be a good and supportive neighbor. Ms. Laurent suggested developing an agreement <br /> with haulers currently holding permits to tip at the UCRTS, adding that it would be to offer <br /> convenience to haulers allowing them to pick up along their regular routes. Mr. Cavossa noted <br /> that he could remove a truck from the road if he was able to combine a route by mixing trash at <br /> the UCRTS. Ms. Brazier inquired whether trash would be allowed only from Cape Cod to avoid <br /> trash traveling over the bridge and Mr. D. Barrett responded that it would be impractical for trash <br /> to be sent over to the UCRTS from off-Cape when Bourne would be more accessible. Mr. Jack <br /> suggested that greater detail was necessary but that he had provided information to Falmouth and <br /> that the Board of Selectmen would need to weigh in on the increased trash being transported <br /> through Falmouth. Mr. Cavossa stated that it would be a small amount of trash,possibly 20-30 <br /> tons extra per month. Mr. D. Barrett noted that the intent would likely be to replace the missing <br /> tonnage to meet the Mass Coastal commitment. Ms. Laurent noted that the UCRTS used to <br /> collect 40,000 tons. <br /> Mr. Cavossa recommended developing a public/private arrangement at the UCRTS in order to <br /> address the deficit issues, noting that the deficit would only get worse next year since rates were <br /> lowered this year. Mr. Cavossa discussed the potential to handle construction and demolition <br /> debris and his offer to load residential waste at no cost. Mr. Jack felt that a public/private <br /> arrangement could be more reasonable and beneficial to the UCRTS, compared to accepting <br /> trash from other communities. <br /> Chairman Elliott recommended that members of the Board talk further at the next meeting about <br /> rules and regulations that would be necessary to accept commercial waste from other <br /> communities. Mr. Cavossa recominended allowing the current haulers licensed to utilize the <br /> facility to bring in mixed loads. The Chair expressed concern about haulers, such as Mr. <br /> Cavossa, who agreed to tip trash at the UCRTS but who were bringing it elsewhere. Mr. <br /> Cavossa stated that a public/private arrangement may allow a renegotiation with the rail. Ms. <br /> 2 <br />