9/21/2011 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Mr. Ba rini made.a notion to wa s the filing and inspection fees for the application. Mr.Kooharian seconded the motion. Ail voted unanimously. Mathew Colbert of the CCRTA stated that the shelter would be maintained. Mr. Kooharian reported that Plan Review had supported the request. Mr. Fudala drafted a decision for review by the-Planning Board. Mr. Bal arini made a motion to approve the Modification of the Special Permit to allow the shelter to be built as proposed by Mashpee ULAC. Mr.I ooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanin oust . Mr. Eddy was advised that a signed and notarized copy of the decision would be available on Friday. Request from Stuart Bornstein, Holl ► Suppty llrlr. Fudala reported that two copies of the s-built plan had been received from Mr. Bornstein and that Nor. Fudala had inspected the site to make comparisons to the plan. Mr. Fudala documented aseries of differences i.n his memo dated 9121111. Chairman Waygan noted her expectation that a 2011 --built plan be submitted. Mr. Bornstein Lein responded that the plans represented what was on the ground, adding that certain site conditions had required some changes. 11r. Bornstein stated that it would be redundant to hire an engineer to draft a new plan. Mr. Bornstein stated that there were some odds and ends variations made due to site condition but that buildings and entrances were located where they were supposed to be located, adding that spots and shrubs, of which o additional shrubs had been planted, � Pig � should not be an issue. Mr. Bornstein reported that the handicap signs had been stolen and would be replaced upon the arrival of a tenant, and would be addressed by the building inspector. In reference to the two dead trees, lir. Bornstein suggested that there were more trees on the site than what was originally rewired, adding that the property was a 15 acre site. The Chair referenced.the issue of the buildings that do not line up. Mr. Rowley owed Haat the foundations did not line up with a difference of a couple of feet and that it was not reflected on the as-built plan. Mr. Rowley ley indicated that the change was not significant and would not impact the site, but that the -bunt plan should reflect cussing conditions. Mr. Fudala coed that theas-built did not match the codsting conditions. Mr. Fudala noted that 8 parking spaces had been eliminated from the original plan and that the handicap parking was not marked on the pavement or by signage. Mr. Fudala stated that the f ncm" g along the stormwater retention area ran along-the pavement and feaftuW no landscaping on either side of the fence. lir. Fudala and the Chair emphasized a need to have a town record showing the current conditions on the site. lir. Bornstein responded Haat he would have an engineer address the concerns. fir. Fudala stated that he was responsible for certifying the landscaping but noted that the dead gees required replacement and that there were gaps in the screening vith the adjacent house where there should be two trees. Mr. Fudala referenced the storrnwater swale where grass was expected but novo consisted of sand and weeds which would.not perforin the necessary nitrogen removal. 11r. Rowley responded that constant irri on would be necessary 3