My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/3/2017 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
>
5/3/2017 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 5:05:18 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 2:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/03/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
abandoning the rail line, and that 1t would first need to be offered to be taken over by other entitles. <br /> Nit-. Cannon was unsure of the formal process, adding that the rail was an active line unlike other lines <br /> converted to a bike path. Mr. Segura referenced Mr. Pea.rson's railroad experience and previous <br /> statements that indicated it would be up to the Federal Service Transportation Board to make the final <br /> decision. Mr. Segura inquired about a potential to relocate the track and Mr. Cannon responded that a <br /> former engineer had suggested the possibility of placing the track on the east side of MacArthur <br /> Boulevard. Mr. Cannon emphasized the support and interest he had experienced in extending the <br /> bike trail, <br /> Mr. Goddard inquired whether the Cape Cod Commission would take on the role of champion and Mr. <br /> Cannon responded that they were a.regional planning agency that would take a project to a certain <br /> point and thea step aside, presenting the information to the town. Mr. Goddard suggested that <br /> interested individuals reach out to MassD OT as a possible regional linkage to access additional <br /> resources. Isar. Cannon agreed that the bilk path could be incorporated into the plans and study that <br /> were being considered to replace the bridges. <br /> Mr. Jack read the study report and stated that an option to relocate the rail without the cost impacts <br /> should not appear in the report without quantification and qualification, as was done with the bike path <br /> options. Mr. Jack added that economic, social and political issues were at stake and that the ultimate <br /> solution should be a vrinlin for everyone. regarding potential financing for construction, TIP funds <br /> should not be used since they were intended for all the communities on Cape and the Chair agreed that <br /> the 10 trillion regional funds for road projects should not be used for the bike path. Mr. Cannon <br /> stated that certain State funding categories were available that could be considered, such as clean air. <br /> Mr. Cavossa inquired whether studies had been completed regarding impacts to property owners <br /> serviced by the rail and Mr. Cannon responded that there had not been studies, adding that studies had <br /> shown that property values along bike trails increased. Mr. Cavossa indicated that property owners <br /> may have purchased their property due to the potential for rail access. <br /> Iaylene Jablecki from Massoasta.l stated that the rail line had not been abandoned and was in active <br /> use by the Cape Cod Central dinner train. Ms. Jablecki added that 3 million had been allocated by the <br /> State for improvements to the North Falmouth trach to be used by 2021. ll ass oastal would be <br /> performing some of the improvements. <br /> Iden Cheitlin of the Bourne Rail Trail expressed his concern that the awarding of the contract would <br /> preclude the fastest and cheapest option for the bike trail, Mr. h-eitlin suggested that the Board step <br /> back so that there was an opportunity to evaluate all of the options to make the rail trail happen. once <br /> awarded, the option to develop the rail into a trail would no longer be viable. Mr. Cheitlin stated that <br /> today, there was not discussion regarding use of the rail as vital to their operation. Mr. Cheitlin asked <br /> that the four member towns have the process step back while the various rail to trail options were being <br /> discussed. Mr, Cheitlin added that the Bourne bail Frail membership collected over 220 signatures of <br /> people asking the Board of Managers to hold the process in abeyance while options were being <br /> considered, adding that the evaluation of options should take precedence. <br /> Pat Johnson of Falmouth stated that the relocation of the rail to the right of way at MacArthur <br /> Boulevard would provide a in/ in alternative. Ms. Johnson also emphasized the need for a very good <br /> trash option with rail available, suggesting that the current UCRTS site would be a beautiful option for <br /> a bike trail. Mr. Goddard explained protections by Massachusetts, sensitive habitat, water supply and <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.