Laserfiche WebLink
1 1 <br /> i••,s^ry <br /> r4�y <br /> TS vMEiVO <br /> To: Board of Selectmen <br /> -q-�� toren <br /> xy4 <br /> From: Executive Secretary, Tour Planner <br /> aw•. <br /> Date: August 2.7, 1996 <br /> "51 <br /> Subject: Review of Mashpee Commons Consultant Proposals Relative to RFP <br /> Comarative Evaluation Criteria <br /> Based on the written proposals submitted and the results of Tuesday's interviews, we <br /> believe that the following ratings are applicable to eachro <br /> p poser based on the <br /> Comparative Evaluation Criteria set out in the Town's Request • <br /> q st for Proposals. <br /> Criteria 1} "The Townon a laces premium p p the proposers approach to the study and the <br /> ability to present a program of services which complies with <br /> p the required Scope of Workin a manner which is clear, concise and complete with respect to required and proposed <br /> activities." <br /> Rankings: McGregor Advantageous <br /> Herr& James Advantageous <br /> Martin Highly Advantageous <br /> Criteria?} "The Town places a premium on the experience p e of the proposer in providing <br /> planning, fiscal impact and market analysis services toublic agencies,p g , particularly the <br /> completion of impact studies similar to that beingro " <br /> p posed. <br /> Rankings: McGregor Advantageous <br /> Herr& James Advantageous <br /> Martin Advantageous <br /> Composite rankins based on the above would be: <br /> g . <br /> 1. Martin Highly Advantageous <br /> 2. Herr&James Advantageous <br /> McGregor Advantageous <br />