My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/09/1996 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Minutes
>
09/09/1996 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2019 3:07:42 PM
Creation date
2/21/2019 3:06:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO <br /> To: Board of Selectmen <br /> From: Executive Secret , Town Planner <br /> anner <br /> Date: August 23, 1996 <br /> Subject: Review of Mashpee Commons mmons Consultant Proposals Relative to <br /> Comarative Evaluation Criteria RFP <br /> 4 <br /> i <br /> Based on the written proposals submitted <br /> and the results of Tuesdays interviews <br /> believe that the followingratings are a ' we <br /> g applicable to each proposer based on th <br /> Comparative Evaluation Criteria set out intProposals:e <br /> he Town's Request for <br /> Criteria 1) "The Townlace <br /> p s a premium on the proposers approach to the stud <br /> ability to present a ro am of sere' y and the <br /> p ices which complies with the required q Scope of work <br /> in a manner which is clear, <br /> concise and complete with respect to required and <br /> activities." q proposed <br /> Rankings: McGregor Advantageous -- <br /> Herr& James Advantageous <br /> M g <br /> Martin Highly Advantageous <br /> Criteria 2) "The Town places aremium o • <br /> p n the experience of the proposer in providing <br /> planning, fiscal impact and market analysis p g . <br /> completion Y services to public agencies,particularly the <br /> p etion of impact studies similar to that beingro ose <br /> proposed." <br /> d". <br /> Rankings:: McGregor Advantageous <br /> Herr& James Advantageous <br /> Martin Advantageous <br /> Composite rankings based on the above would • <br /> be. <br /> 1. Martin Highly <br /> g y Advantageous <br /> 2. Herr&James Advantageous <br /> McGregor Advantageous <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.