My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/15/2019 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
01/15/2019 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2019 5:00:21 PM
Creation date
3/25/2019 2:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'TotPrt of Maslipee <br /> 16 G -at�Necce Apad,.Aoi th <br /> Al asscachusetts 02649 <br /> Minutes of Meeting of <br /> Design Review Committee <br /> Held Tuesday, January 15, 2019 <br /> Mashpee Town Hall Waquoit Meeting Room <br /> Design Review Committee Members Present: Michael Mendoza, <br /> Jonathan Furbush, Joe Cummings, and Miles Peters, and Evan Lehrer, <br /> Town Planner. <br /> Absent: Joshua Spencer <br /> Committee Discussion with Town Planner to discuss quidelines, process <br /> and scope of work for the Design Review Committee. <br /> Mike Mendoza called the meeting to order at 8:35 am. The purpose for the <br /> meeting was to come up with definitive guidelines for applicants to follow <br /> under the direction of the Design Review Committee. The Committee <br /> submitted suggestions and ideas prior to this meeting, and Mike passed <br /> them out. Mike wants to have Evan comment on these suggestions. <br /> Jonathan started with his idea and went to the source reading the bylaws <br /> listed under §174-48 Item A. He read the first few lines directly from the <br /> book that states the Design Review Committee shall be established to <br /> advise the Building Inspector, Planning Board, and Board of Appeals. <br /> Evan joined the meeting at 8:50 am. He mentioned that at one time the <br /> Design and Plan review met as one body. He wants to know how each <br /> committee can define the scope of their responsibilities so that jurisdictions <br /> don't cross each other even though they are related. He said that he doesn't <br /> want to give an applicant testimony and advise, or advisory approval or <br /> conditional approval on certain criteria that the Design Review finds to be <br /> important that could be contradictory if the same items are listed, i.e., <br /> building placement. What are the elements that Design Review is tasked <br /> with, and what is Plan Review tasked with because they're separate bodies. <br /> Jonathan and Mike agree. But there isn't any mention of Plan Review <br /> criteria in the bylaws. Mike gave an example of reviewing a plan for the Dog <br /> Center. If an application doesn't fall under Plan Review, what are the <br /> suggestions or recommendations, and where does it fall under. Is it going <br /> straight to the ZBA, knowing that they're advisory? Plan Review knows they <br /> need to make a decision to agree or not. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.