Laserfiche WebLink
Cape would have greater buying power as a region and cited an example in Freetown, MA. Mr. <br /> Finneran inquired about the separation of commercial and residential waste in SEMAS S' <br /> agreement and Ms. Laurent responded that Mashpee's contract was always for residential only. <br /> Discussion: Bourne/SEMASS Agreement <br /> Mr. D. Barrett reported that the Bourne Board of Selectmen voted to sign a ten year agreement <br /> with COVVANTA to accept their ash. During the first three years, Bourne would maintain the <br /> current MSW intake, supplemented with ash for disposal, but in 2015 Bourne would go to 95% <br /> ash for disposal, leaving 3 0,000 tons to be utilized. As part of the agreement, COVANTA would <br /> handle Bourne's MSW for 20 years following the closure of the landfill. Continued operation of <br /> the landfill, as is, would have closed the landfill sometime around 2025, but the agreement would <br /> guarantee Bourne a favorable rate for disposal over the next 30 years. Although 6,000 tons <br /> would be needed for Bourne's use, 24,000-25,000 tons would be available for the use of <br /> Mashpee, Sandwich and Falmouth. Pricing would be discussed at a later date. It was clarified <br /> that the offer would be for the local municipal trash and did not include commercial tonnage. <br /> Ms. Laurent inquired whether Bourne had other business contracts and Mr. D. Barrett responded <br /> that existing business deals would end by 2015: Mr. Tilton inquired whether Bourne was <br /> offering the right of first refusal and Mr. D. Barrett responded that they would for the next year. <br /> Mr. Goddard added that Bourne had also opened RFPs regarding the management of landfill gas <br /> and anaerobic digestion and that responses had been received. Mr. Goddard also discussed the <br /> DEP's plans toward creating a commercial food waste ban. <br /> Mr. Cavossa inquired about Bourne's ideal situation at the UCRTS. Mr. D. Barrett noted that, <br /> with increased recycling in towns due to cost increases, a site may be needed to consolidate the <br /> recycling and recommended that the Commission identify a regional approach to recycling. Mr. <br /> D. Barrett suggested that Bourne's plan would be to expand their transfer station. Mr. Cavossa <br /> expressed concern regarding Bourne's agreement and the loss of competition that could <br /> negatively impact commercial businesses. MIs. Laurent noted that the towns had done what they <br /> could to assist haulers, adding that volumes increased only when costs were lowered. Mr. <br /> Cavossa emphasized that business communities needed to also be considered. Mr. D. Barrett <br /> suggested that the commercial market for trash may develop. Mr. D. Barrett added that the <br /> Board of Managers would make every effort to turn around the UCRTS if it could serve a <br /> regional purpose. Mr. Goddard suggested the possibility of developing a food waste option for <br /> commercial businesses which would help to ease some pressures associated with disposal. Mr. <br /> Tilton inquired whether the available 24,000 tons would be available for a 10 year period and <br /> Mr. D. Barrett confirmed that it would be for 10 years or longer, beginning with residential. <br /> Discussion: Transfer Station [operations <br /> Mr. Podgurski reported that MassDOT had expressed interest in acquiring the rail line from <br /> North Falmouth to the Airbase, allowing upgrades to be completed and improving the potential <br /> usage of the rail to ship surplus or diverted materials. Mr. Podgurski stated that rates had been <br /> made available to any companies expressing interest for C&D or recyclables, but that tonnages <br /> would be needed to develop the rates. Mr. Podgurski cited examples from Canada and <br /> Pennsylvania. Mr. Podgurski stated that, should the UCRTS be privatized, the rail would be <br /> exempt from federal and state permitting. Mr.Podgurski emphasized his willingness to <br /> cooperate with the Board of Managers. <br /> 3 <br />