My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/30/2012 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
>
8/30/2012 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2019 5:06:38 PM
Creation date
4/24/2019 2:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/30/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> proposers did not require put or pay other than Sustainable New Energy. All proposers used the <br /> CPI to assess the"Escalation Factor." "Fuel Adjustment"varied among the companies, some <br /> were required and some were not and the formula utilized varied. Ms. Laurent noted that <br /> companies using different disposal sites would affect the fuel surcharge. "Disposal only" <br /> identified companies that would provide disposal only while towns handled the delivery of the <br /> waste. "Transportation and Disposal" provided hauling and disposal. <br /> Waste Management-Preference of 5 year terra with two 5 year options with no put or <br /> pay. CPI would be used as the escalation factor. WM proposed utilizing the UCRTS for truck. <br /> The WM formula fuel adjustment would be based upon a$3.70 baseline price for fuel with an <br /> adjustment of 1% for every .05 per gallon change. The disposal only option was reserved for <br /> off--Cape only. T&D for the UCRTS would be $78.06 per ton, although WM was asked to <br /> provide a cost for each of the towns. It was noted that WM would also be seeking a minimum <br /> tonnage per trailer requirement which would be 23 tons per trailer for the UCRTS. There was <br /> discussion suggesting that the towns would likely not have 23 tons per trailer. It was noted that <br /> for some towns it would not make financial sense to send waste to the UCRTS only to be <br /> reloaded back into WM trucks. <br /> E.L. Harvey-offered 5, 10 or 20 year terms with no put or pay and use of the CPI as the <br /> escalation factor. Fuel adjustment would be a$3.00 baseline with a 1% increase for every .10 <br /> per gallon change. Disposal only for Cape was $52.37, although the disposal site would be <br /> located over loo miles away adding approximately $6.00 more per ton. T&D was $78.37 with a <br /> pick up at each individual town. Prices would decrease with the addition of recycling. <br /> Bourne-A quote was not provided but Bourne indicated that they would be willing to <br /> negotiate. There was capacity for 24,040 tons per year at the facility and there was interest in a 5 <br /> year contract with the option to extend it for 2 years, for a total of 7 years. At a recent UCRTS <br /> meeting, an offer from Bourne was extended to the upper Cape towns. Mr. D. Barrett stated that <br /> they responded to SwAC's request because the upper Cape towns were part of SwAC. Mr. D. <br /> Barrett confirmed that the upper Cape towns would have first consideration and, if interested in <br /> establishing an agreement, remaining capacity would be available for other towns. <br /> We Care[organics-Prices were available for all terms and there was no put or pay. The <br /> CPI was used for escalation and the fuel adjustment was similar to WM, with a$3.80 per gallon <br /> baseline and a 1% increase for every .50 per gallon change. No disposal option was available <br /> but the price for pick up for T&D would be $88.66 at each town's facility. we Care also offered <br /> to pick up solid waste at Yarmouth. More clarity was needed regarding rail versus truck costs. <br /> Mr. D. Barrett noted that we Care was seeking a rail siding in Taunton. <br /> Interstate waste Technologies-Mr. Tilton noted that Interstate waste and we Care <br /> Organics would initially be working together. It was not clear whether Interstate waste had been <br /> permitted to develop their facility in Taunton so there was some hesitation to consider Interstate <br /> Waste as a viable option. Mr. Goddard recommended contacting Taunton City Council for more <br /> information about the parcel of land set aside for the project. Disposal only would be $56 and <br /> T&D would be $82. <br /> Sustainable New Energy--The facility had not yet been built or permitted, but could be a <br /> consideration in the future. Disposal only cost would be $50 and there was an offer to site it <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.