My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/14/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
08/14/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2019 5:04:40 PM
Creation date
9/16/2019 2:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/14/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> AUGUST 14,2019 <br /> Ron mentioned he had a discussion with Town Counsel regarding his interpretations of the <br /> bylaw §174.17.1 that was passed at Town Meeting back in October 2018. <br /> Attorney Kirrane addressed the Board stating that the bylaw states one cannot create a new <br /> non-conformity,which would require variance relief. The non-conforming condition is the <br /> front yard setback. One can alter or extend that non-conformity but one cannot create a <br /> new non-conformity. If the applicant had a conforming setback of 40 ft., and he wanted to <br /> change to 30 ft., he is creating a variance situation which is a new non-conformity. But <br /> altering or extending an existing non-conformity does not require a variance, it merely <br /> requires a special permit from the Board, and a finding that it is not substantially more <br /> detrimental. In this particular case, the setback is 37 ft., and moving to 30 ft., but the <br /> requirement is 40 ft. At 37 ft., it is already a non-conforming front yard setback condition. <br /> He is increasing or altering that non-conformity, but not creating a new non-conformity at <br /> 37 ft. <br /> The Board reviewed the site plan and determined that the average setback with the abutting <br /> neighbors is 40 ft. <br /> Jonathan asked Evan Lehrer, Town Planner if he could comment on the §174-17.1; if <br /> someone can extend a non-conformity on a raze and replace. Evan said he agrees that the <br /> bylaw is specific, and he also agrees with the Attorney Kirrane and the applicant's <br /> discussion with the Board. <br /> Charlie said the applicant could have applied for a building permit for this issue only, he <br /> would site §174-31 fn. 6,because the average is 30 ft. and conforming to the adjacent lots. <br /> Bill Blaisdell said in his opinion either way interpreting the"average setbacks"or the way <br /> the bylaw is written and approved; he agrees with the applicant. <br /> Ron asked Charlie if a motion were made for a Special Permit, would that be acceptable. <br /> Charlie said; yes. <br /> There were no more comments from the Board or audience. <br /> Sharon read the Board of Health comments and abutter letters into the record. <br /> Ron made a motion that the Board issues a Special Permit to Kevin M. David Trustee of <br /> the David Family Realty Trust of 2 Santuit Lane under §174-17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to <br /> raze and replace a pre-existing non-conforming single family structure on property located <br /> in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 30 Parcels 22 & 23, Mashpee, MA, with the following <br /> conditions; <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.