My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/09/2005 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
>
09/09/2005 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 1:32:18 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 1:31:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
334 Main Street <br /> Special Permit Modification <br /> Replace One Permitted Building(4,980sf)with Two (2,104sf) Smaller Buildings <br /> SM Realty Trust, John McShane, Trustee <br /> Steven Hayes,the architect, stated the project is for office use and will total 4,208sf, which is <br /> 800sf less than the original plan. He reviewed a site plan and elevations of the modification for <br /> the two-story buildings that were reviewed by the Design Review Committee. There are no <br /> other changes to the parking, terrace and walkway. Tom F. stated they may be able to make <br /> these site plan changes without a public hearing since they are not increasing the square footage <br /> and there is no text change. He can put them on the Planning Board agenda for the 21st of <br /> September, and they can possibly act on it. They need to file an application with the Building <br /> Department. Tom asked that Matt Teague contact him. He can check the existing special permit <br /> decision to see if they require sprinklers. The basement is 1,206sf with restricted ceiling height <br /> and will be used for storage and mechanical space. Sheldon asked to go on record as highly <br /> recommending a sprinkler system. Conservation has no comment. <br /> Realty Advisory, Inc. <br /> Richard Tabaczynski <br /> 168 and 184 Industrial Drive <br /> Map 88 and Parcel 35 & 36 <br /> Informal Discussion <br /> Tom Andrade and Shawn Geis from Atlantic Designs presenting. <br /> Messrs. Andrade and Geis presented a preliminary plan for a 44,800 sf, 13-unit industrial <br /> building. The unit sizes vary from 3,100 to 5,000 sf. He is meeting with the Cape Cod <br /> Commission next week for some comments. The development will take place on two lots <br /> totaling 4.3 acres. Tom Fudala noted this project is subject to a development agreement with the <br /> Cape Cod Commission and requires a special permit from the Planning Board as well. It is in <br /> Zone 11 and in a couple of bay recharge areas. The use will be light industry/warehouse storage <br /> with incidental offices. The aluminum doors in the back of the building are for garage use and <br /> loading. They plan to install a storm-water detention basin with a sub-surface leaching structure <br /> so there will be no standing water. They plan to lease out space so there will most likely be <br /> property maintenance and management. They plan to put in a de-nitrification system for septic. <br /> Their design flow is based on 9 people per unit or 117 people total at 15 gal per person per day for <br /> a total of 1,755 gal per day. They provided for 109 parking spaces. Health department asked <br /> about the use of hazardous materials and noted that there are restrictions on floor drains. Floor <br /> drains are not allowed by BOH regulation. Fire department requires use group identification <br /> which will determine the hazardous material use, a site plan drawn to allow them to put a turn <br /> radius on, and hydrants sited. The dumpster needs to be 25' away from building or else be <br /> sprinklered. He may need fire separation between units depending on use. They need to forward <br /> preliminary plans to the Building Inspector. Tom noted that it does not look like they have <br /> enough room for the 10' landscape buffer requirement because of the stormwater drainage areas, <br /> buildings and parking. There may need to be some reductions to meet the landscape <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.