Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> F <br /> hasn't. Wouldn't you rather sage the taxpayers money? <br /> Toni is also more comfortable matching calculations to similar sources - i.e. housing to housing. <br /> Doug doesn't think it matters where it comes from. If the schools are a concerns,they can <br /> change the phasing and not do the schools first. <br /> Doug thinks it would be good for the town facilities to tie in and be able to say they are Ong <br /> care of this problem they have been talking about. <br /> 'one is most concerned about the schools. <br /> Doug said there are 3 entities involved in this and it will take time to get a consensus. <br /> t seems the Sewer Commission's initial reaction is they would rather Mashpee Commons does <br /> not use the schools in the first phase. <br /> John asked what mechanism they would use to tie everyone in <br /> Doug said that is something that has to be discussed, its an unknown right now. <br /> } Tom is a little reluctant to buy into a concept without the relocation pipeline resolved. ,Adding <br /> anything to the r* r is not good. <br /> Doug said this will get it to net zero. They cannot solve the pipeline issue. within 2 years we <br /> will know a lot more from the Stearns and wheeler study. They will not be ready to tie anyone in <br /> before 2 years. The project will take 15 yews to build out. <br /> e thinks this proposal makes a lot of sense for a first step and hope the Sewer Commission <br /> feels the sane. <br /> Tom said as part of the picture is makes sense but it is not the whole picture. <br /> The Sewer Commission wants to keep working With Mashpee Commons. <br /> Dennis likes the concept. <br /> John thinks if the town facilities get tied in free,, it saves everyone money. <br /> Contract discussion with Stearns and wheeler. <br /> Bill Hall was present to discuss the contract. <br /> Tom has a marked up version of the draft. Bill is not clear if these are changes that were <br /> agreed on. <br /> John thought we would have a new.version to review tonight. <br /> "one said one big issue must be resolved: payment schedule/method of payment. <br /> Worn is concerned about paying monthly, and not having payment tied to the product because he <br /> is concerned about running out of money and not having a product in hand. <br /> S&w said if they are not following the schedule each month,.then they are not in compliance <br /> with the contract. They cannot absorb all this cost for the fee that they quoted. S&w will do <br /> monthly reports and if your' not happy with the progress, can hold back that months payment. <br /> However, if the town is holding S&W hack,because of information they need to proceed,then it <br /> becomes a pfobl ern and they can't produce the deliverable. <br /> They are open to compromise. <br /> 'tom is willing to give a continual flow of money but with some deliverables tied to it. He would <br /> 2 <br />