My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/8/2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
1/8/2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 12:18:05 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 12:17:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/08/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JANUARY 8,2020 <br /> Mr. Goldstein, seconded, yes <br /> Mr. Blaisdell, yes <br /> Mr. Bonvie, yes <br /> Ms. Sangeleer, yes <br /> Mr. Furbush, yes <br /> All were in favor of the Variance request for the shed. <br /> 44 Barbary Circle: Owner, Diana M. Leccese requests a Written Finding under §174-17 <br /> of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for changes, extensions or alterations of a pre-existing,non- <br /> conforming single-family structure on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 96 <br /> Parcel 104G, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from December 11, 2019 hearings, opened but <br /> not heard). <br /> 44 Barbary Circle: Owner, Diana Leccese requests Variance relief from the side and <br /> front yard setbacks, and lot coverage under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for <br /> changes, extensions or alterations of a pre-existing, non-conforming single-family <br /> structure on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 96 Parcel 104G, Mashpee, <br /> MA. (Continued from December 11, 2019 Hearings, opened but not heard). <br /> Mr. Steve Cook, Cotuit Bay Design represented Diana Leccese for the renovation project. <br /> The house was built in 1982 located on the Mashpee River and is pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming because it's 26.9 ft. from the front property line. The property has a steep drop- <br /> off toward the river behind the house. The homeowner would like to expand the garage 12 <br /> ft. towards the street, and 4 ft. towards the south property line in order to construct a porch <br /> between the garage and the existing part of the house. The proposed addition on the garage <br /> will be 28 ft. from the property line, so it's over 1 ft. behind the non-conforming part of <br /> the house off the front property line. The side setback is currently 34.2 ft. and the proposed <br /> is 30 ft., which meets the requirements. The lot coverage is 13.4% and also meets the <br /> requirements. The project was approved by the Board of Health and Conservation <br /> Commission. There's no encroachment toward the coastal bank; it's just a 4 ft. extension <br /> toward the building line. <br /> Mr. Furbush asked what the distance was for the shed to the property line. Mr. Cook said <br /> is 5 ft. from the property line and it's an 8' x 10' shed. <br /> The Board wanted to confirm that the relief request was for only the front yard setback. <br /> The current setback is 26.9 ft. on the north side of the house. Steve said the garage is 28 <br /> ft., so the Variance request is 12 ft. from the front yard setback. The reason for the Written <br /> Finding request is because the project is not any more non-conforming than what currently <br /> exists. <br /> Mr. Goldstein read the Board of Health and Conservation comments into the record. There <br /> were no more comments from the Board. There were no comments from the audience. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.