Laserfiche WebLink
Board members did not want to make any decision without Mr. Cabral being present. Since the area is <br /> somewhat isolated and the debris is not an immediate health hazard, the Board concluded it would be <br /> prudent to give Mr. Cabral a few weeks to respond to the order letters, and an opportunity to attend.an : <br /> upcoming meeting with a plan to remedy the situation. Mr. Harrington will continue to communicate the <br /> gravity of the situation to Mr. Cabral. <br /> There being no further comments or. discussion, Mallory Langler moved to continue the show-cause <br /> hearing for Cabral Container, 81 Echo Road, to next meeting. Motion seconded by Veronica.Warden. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous (3-0). <br /> 7:20—Mashpee Tobacco Regulation <br /> Mr. Harrington commented that, due to confusion regarding Fronto leaves and Fronto cigars, he believes <br /> the Board should amend the regulation to include those specific Fronto products by name as an example <br /> in the definition of a blunt wrap. It is his opinion that It would dispel any misunderstanding among the <br /> retailers, to add "(e.g. Fronto leaves and Fronto cigars that are loosely wrapped tobacco leaves)" at the <br /> end of the definition of a blunt wrap in the regulation. <br /> Mr. Harrington informed the Board that a Fronto supplier visited the Health Department with samples of <br /> the Fronto cigars that other towns were allowing because they are not.loosely wrapped so are not <br /> considered to be blunt wraps. The supplier also provided a letter from the Town of Somerville saying that <br /> they allow these products. It was Mr. Harrington's opinion that these particular Fronto cigars and <br /> cigarillos should not be considered blunt wraps because they cannot,be unraveled, so nothing can be <br /> added to them. Ms. Langler expressed some confusion as to'why blunt wraps would be categorized as a <br /> prohibited product and not other rolling papers, and apologized for not asking the question at the time <br /> the regulation was originally under review. Mr. Harrington stated that regular rolling papers are made <br /> from rice and other natural materials,while.blunt wraps are made from tobacco leaves. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel suggested that the Board focus on clarifying the definition of .a blunt wrap in the <br /> regulation,and postpone looking at blunt wraps as a prohibited product until a later date. He expressed <br /> concern about using the brand name Fronto within the regulation and asked Mr. Harrington to get an <br /> opinion from Town Counsel. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion,Mallory Langler moved to amend the Tobacco Regulation <br /> to include the proposed wording"(e.g. Fronto leaves and Fronto cigars that are loosely wrapped tobacco <br /> leaves)"following the definition of blunt wrap. Motion seconded by Veronica Warden. VOTE: Unanimous <br /> (3-0)., <br /> 7:25—135 Main Street <br /> Mr. Harrington commented that Mr. Java has returned due to his concern over the Board's decision <br /> relative to the recent tobacco violation at 414 Nathan Ellis Highway,Commons Convenience. On April 23, <br /> 2019, Mr. Java's establishment at 135 Main Street had a tobacco violation that involved Fronto leaves. <br /> The Board issued a stay of the fines for that violation,provided no other tobacco violations were cited for <br /> a 12-month period. On July 29,2019,tobacco was sold to a minor at 135 Main Street and,as a result,the <br /> violation and fines of April 23rd were re-instated. Due to this second violation, a five-day suspension of <br /> the tobacco permit was also issued. <br /> Mr. Harrington clarified that, in the case of Commons Convenience, the first violation was for sale to a <br /> minor and the second violation was for the Fronto leaves. Due to the confusion surrounding the Fronto <br /> 2 <br />