Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JULY 8,2020 <br /> 3 Seconsett Point Road: Owner,Robert L. Lynch requests a Special Permit under §174- <br /> 17.1 and §174-33 (Setbacks from wetlands) of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace a <br /> non-conforming single family residence with a new single family residence and garage on <br /> property located in an R-3 Zoning District,Map 119 Parcel 2,Mashpee,MA. <br /> Attorney,Kevin Kirrane represented the application for the homeowners and were present. <br /> Also present was Todd Carson,Rick with Brown,Lindquist,Fenuccio&Raber Architects, <br /> and Kieran Healy, with BSC Group. This is a request to raze and replace a pre-existing, <br /> non-conforming structure.The existing building is non-conforming and is setback from the . <br /> southerly boundary line at 9.7 ft. The setback from the northerly boundary is 13.6 ft. The <br /> requirement for the side and rear is 15 ft. The setback from the wetlands is 14.1ft., and the <br /> requirement is 50 ft. Therefore,the building is non-conforming in those three aspects. <br /> The proposed structure will improve for two of the setbacks that are non-conforming, and <br /> eliminates one of those setbacks that is non-conforming. The setback from the northerly <br /> boundary line will be 15 ft., and that conforms to the current setbacks. The setbacks from <br /> the southerly boundary line is 10.5 ft.,and the setbacks from the wetlands increases to 16.7 <br /> ft. This has eliminated the non-conformity on the northerly side and improves the <br /> conditions on the southerly side, and the distance to the wetland resource area. <br /> The lot is oddly shaped and is bounded by the wetlands, and there is a seawall constructed <br /> as noted on the plan. The proposed residential structure is just over 2,700 sq. ft. on two <br /> floors, and Section 174-17.1 of the bylaws allows for the raze and replace of a single or a <br /> two family residential structure provided that the Board grants a Special Permit. The <br /> proposed conditions are no more detrimental than the existing conditions, and there are no <br /> new non-conforming conditions that would require relief from the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals. There is sufficient parking onsite to accommodate the needs of a residential use. <br /> There is a garage that is part of the proposed plan that did not exist in the first plan. There <br /> is sufficient distance between the proposed dwelling and the roadway to accommodate <br /> many cars from the roadway. There will be a new code compliant Title 5 septic system and <br /> the new construction will also conform to current day building codes.The project has been <br /> approved by the Conservation Commission with an Order of Conditions. The proposal is <br /> not creating any new non-conforming conditions, and will not be detrimental to the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Jonathan agrees that the project has improved compared to what existed. Scott agrees with <br /> Jon,Bill agreed, Sharon agreed, and Mr. Gould agreed. <br /> Jonathan asked if the water runoff will be captured by dry wells on the property. Attorney <br /> Kirrane said that there is proper drainage for any roof runoff. Kieran Healy said that there <br /> are two dry wells positioned on the property to collect any runoff from the building. <br /> There were no more comments from the Board. <br /> Sharon read a letter from the owners of 9 Kanter Lane who supported the project. <br /> 4 <br />