My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/5/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
8/5/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 3:05:46 PM
Creation date
10/2/2020 2:01:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/05/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Board of Sewer Commissioners <br /> Meeting Minutes. <br /> August 5,2010 at 4:45 p.m. <br /> Stratford Ponds Association Pond Room <br /> Present: Chair Tom Fudala, Clerk Ralph Marcelli, Jack Malarkey, Oskar Klenert, Torn O'Hara <br /> Absent: Vice Chair Burton Kaplan, Joe Lyons <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> The meeting was called to order with a quorum by Chairman Tom Fudala at 5:00 p.m. <br /> AGENDA ITEMS <br /> Stratford Ponds Sewer Plant Site Visit <br /> The Chair provided Commission members with a layout of the treatment plant prepared by Stearns& <br /> Wheler. Commissioners were introduced to Peter Lewis(Division Manager), Steve Silva(Engineer in <br /> Wastewater Operations) and Octavio Pisaro(Chief Operator of the facility)from Coler& Colantonio <br /> who have managed the plant for the last 6-7 years_ <br /> Mr. Lewis introduced the facility as the grandfather of the Amphidrome system describing it as the <br /> first full sized installation and reported that it continues to perform well. Outside of the fenced area, <br /> Mr. Lewis pointed out the main lift system which is fed from three remote gravity lift stations located <br /> elsewhere. Two pumps in the main lift system run through a valve chamber which moves the flow into <br /> the plant. A diagram of the flow schematic is available in the Stratford Ponds Wastewater Treatment <br /> Facility document. Mr. Lewis described the plant as a dual train Amphidrome system, meaning that <br /> two of the same technologies are located side by side(noted as A and B on the diagram). The first step <br /> in the process includes the primary settling tank. The majority of the treatment occurs at the <br /> Amphidrome reactor which is the black tank located on top of the plant. Clear wells, where the final <br /> effluent is pumped out to the field, are located between where the group stood and the Amphidrome <br /> reactor. Mr. Lewis stated that it is not a linear process because the water flows through the <br /> Amphidrome over a 12 hour process period. Mechanical equipment is located inside the process tanks <br /> or the control room. The control room includes a computer control panel, blowers, chemical pumps <br /> and a series of pumps are located in the tanks_ Mr. Lewis pointed out the odor control unit which was <br /> retrofitted approximately 6-7 years ago. The average peak flow is estimated at 18-22 and the off- <br /> season flow is estimated at 134 5. The system was designed to manage a flow of 35,500 gallons per <br /> day. <br /> The Chair questioned issues of noise and Mr. Lewis identified the blower that dissipates gases from the <br /> tanks noting that the blowers run approximately 4-6 hours per day on a cycle. Additionally, the <br /> backwash process requires all blowers and equipment to run at the same time also approximately 4-6 <br /> hours per day. The system has a 30-30-10 discharge permit (30 BOD-30 TSS-10 Total Nitrogen). The <br /> Chair questioned previous issues regarding town imposed limits of nitrogen and Mr. Lewis reported <br /> that total nitrogen has been consistently below 5 due to various upgrades with no recent permit <br /> violations. Mr. O'Hara questioned the pumps being used and Mr. Lewis stated that the system uses <br /> gravity to direct flow to two main lift stations with 2 pumps each. It was noted that no particular <br /> component was more expensive than another and that the odor control system was the most significant <br /> maintenance cost. Mr. Baker questioned the possibility of removal of items trapped in the system and <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.