My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
11/16/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 3:13:02 PM
Creation date
10/2/2020 2:04:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regarding Falmouth's plan to expand the plant and sewering,Mr_ O'Hara questioned whether barriers would <br /> be used in conjunction with sewering and if Sea Coast Shores would be sewered. Mr. Weeks confirmed that <br /> Sea Coast Shores would be sewered. Mr. Weeks added that the existing wastewater treatment facility is a <br /> newer facility located on a large, favorable site for treatment. Although additional flow can not be recharged <br /> there due to nitrogen sensitivity, flow will be pumped elsewhere. The Chair questioned use of ocean outfall <br /> and Mr. Weeks confirmed that it continues to be evaluated. Mr. O'Hara referenced the widening the outlets <br /> and questioned whether dredging would occur. Mr. Weeks confirmed that some dredging would occur in <br /> order to maintain the outlets and added that some dredging may occur in Perch Pond. <br /> Chairman Fudala confirmed that he will draft a letter to be forwarded to Falmouth Selectmen and the Cape <br /> Cod Commission and questioned whether a letter should be sent to Falmouth regarding the sewering decision <br /> for Waquoit. Mr. O'Hara recommended asking them to reconsider and Mr. Klenert did not feel that a letter <br /> should be sent about Waquoit. Mr. Lyons recommended tabling a final decision until a letter of support is <br /> processed. <br /> Lombardo Associates <br /> A bill has been submitted to the Sewer Commission by Mr. Lombardo, in the amount of$585 for attending <br /> the last meeting. Mr. Malarkey questioned the number of hours worked which the Chair confirmed to be 3 <br /> hours. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion to pay the bill. Mr.O'Hara seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Commissioners signed the warrant. <br /> Chairman Fudala introduced Gary Rubenstein of Lombardo Associates who performs much of the technical <br /> work. <br /> Budget Subcommittee <br /> Chairman Fudala referenced the Capital Improvement budget memo from the Town Manager and the Sewer <br /> Commission 6 year budget plan located in the Commissioners' packets. The Sewer Commission has been <br /> encouraged over the last 7 or 8 years to submit the request as a placeholder. The Chair has provided a copy <br /> of last year's request and noted that the previous year is typically pushed back one year since firm.figures are <br /> not currently available. Chairman Fudala stated that a cost was available for the effluent relocation pipeline. <br /> The other estimated costs are for sewer systems and decentralized clusters. The Chair also suggested that the <br /> Budget Subcommittee meet to discuss it further. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion that it be forward by one year,keeping all three of the subjects as they are <br /> and the spreadsheet the same as it is but the year moved forward by one. Mr. O'Hara seconded the <br /> motion. <br /> Mr. Klenert expressed concern about listing costs and asked if the pipeline was still a consideration. The <br /> Chair confirmed that the pipeline remained a consideration and part of the GHD contract. Mr. Lyons noted <br /> that the request offers the best approximation of cost available at the current time and that the request is a <br /> way to stay informed about the upcoming process. The Chair noted that the information has been part of the <br /> public record for the past 9 years as part of the CIP budget. Mr. Klenert emphasized the need to inform the <br /> public, and questioned the way in which$470 million would be utilized. The Chair referenced the 5 <br /> scenarios including a scenario that indicated the cost would be below $470 million. <br /> 5 Commissioners voted yes-Mr.Klenert abstained <br /> HAC/MHA's Breezy Acres Expansion Project <br /> Chairman Fudala noted that Charles Rowley would be performing the inspection due to the approved 40B <br /> Comprehensive Permit and developer agreement setting aside$5,000 for Mr. Rowley's review and <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.