Laserfiche WebLink
through the use of constructed (stormwater) wetlands, bioretention facilities, vegetated filter <br /> strips, rain gardens, wet (retention) ponds, water quality swales, organic filters or similar <br /> site-appropriate current best management practices capable of removing significant amounts of <br /> nitrogen and other contaminants from stormwater. Said stormwater treatment facilities shall be <br /> designed and sized to retain up to the first inch of rainfall from their catchment area within the <br /> area designed for nitrogen treatment, before any overflow to subsurface leaching facilities and <br /> otherwise meet the Stormwater Management Standards and technical guidance contained in the <br /> Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's Stormwater Management Handbook, <br /> Volumes I and 2, dated March 1997, for the type of use proposed and the soil types present on <br /> the site. Such runoff shall not be discharged directly to rivers, streams, other surface water <br /> bodies, wetlands or vernal pools. Except for overflow from stormwater treatment facilities as <br /> described above and when there are no other feasible alternatives, dry wells shall be prohibited. <br /> Except when used for roof runoff from non-galvanized roofs and for runoff from minor <br /> ,residential streets, all such wetlands, ponds, swales, or other infiltration facilities shall be <br /> preceded by oil, grease and sediment traps or forebays, or other best management practices to <br /> facilitate control of hazardous materials spills and removal of contamination and to avoid <br /> sedimentation of treatment and leaching facilities." <br /> or take any other action relating thereto. <br /> Submitted by Planning Board <br /> Explanation: This article is intended to update the stormwater management by-law adopted in <br /> 1999 by specifying additional practices and facilities which appear to be effective in. reducing <br /> nitrogen in runoff, deleting reference to certain facilities which have not proven effective and <br /> providing additional design guidance regarding volume of flows required to be treated. The <br /> article also renum ers the section to move it to a more appropriate section of the zoning by-law. <br /> The Board of Selectmen recommends approval. <br /> The Finance Committee recommends approval by a vote of 4-0. <br /> Motion made to dispense with reading of article <br /> Motion to dispense with reading of article passes at 8:43 PMO <br /> Planning Board voted at a Public Hearing held on September 20, 2006 5-0 to recommend <br /> approval. <br /> Motion made by Selectman Don Myers. <br /> Motion: I move Article 24 be voted as printed in the warrant, except for the phrase "or take any <br /> other action relating thereto". <br /> Motion passes unanimously at 8:13 PM. <br /> 19 <br />