My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/06/1972 Annual Town Meeting
>
03/06/1972 Annual Town Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2021 11:36:39 AM
Creation date
2/24/2021 12:13:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Town Meeting Warrants
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> i <br /> 3 <br /> Page 2 <br /> i <br /> Article 34 contiTnued: <br /> Lehmann speaking - room? (laughter) I want to commit some f <br /> these birds to a couple of hours work a week. <br /> Moderator calls the meeting back to order. <br /> Mrs. Aiken: Why don 't we D t a drive on? <br /> Moderator: We must get beck to the conduct of the meeting. <br /> We are now concerned with an appropriation of $2,000.00. <br /> Mrs. Miller: I want to know how much it will coast? <br /> Moderator: $34,000.00 to complete <br /> Garland: $54,000 to complete? Is there a motion before the house? <br /> Moderator: Yes - to appropriate $2,000.00. <br /> arl d t I: think we are going to peak ourselves to pieces. I hope <br /> you, vote this down. Let me mike a motion to appropriateenough t <br /> finish this thing once and for ll. We ha�;,e to speed $34,00 . We <br /> have spent some already. I meant to understand where and how w <br /> stand. You have spent $20,000.00. Would another $14,000.00 complete <br /> it - with your 2 hours labor? <br /> Lawrence : (new Fin Com. member) The question is whether $14,000.00 <br /> will do it® Next year costs will go Is this $1.4,000.00 based <br /> on what yea-9 We meat have some bonded person tied down to a contract <br /> and a price, They must be banded, <br /> 65 ®00 is the amount we spent with the least contractor, <br /> and we had a good contract and a bond and the work was satisfactory. <br /> You are eight - without a contract when the work was finally finislh- <br /> d the deal could have cost more® But I don' t think we can spend <br /> $14,000.00 with no free cash in the reassess to do the job.® I <br /> think we should h6ve some money available for material and try to get <br /> the people to come forward to hells with the work. I have had sotrte � <br /> ; mot in it myself. . . . .doing leg work. . . .running to the Registry of <br /> r <br /> Deeds, etc. ''zany more exhibits woulde donated if we had some 1 <br /> to put teem, The money just spent has been spent wisely - our <br /> c.ontractor was bonded - sae did goad work ® i will stand behind it. <br /> The Moderator reminded that a motion was still before the house to <br /> raise and appropriate $2,000.00. It was seconded and so voted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.