My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/05/1973 Annual Town Meeting
>
03/05/1973 Annual Town Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2021 5:10:14 PM
Creation date
3/9/2021 1:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Town Meeting Warrants
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 12 . Knual Town I'-,_ shwee Monday March 5 , <br /> WON 7 Continued : <br /> At this point the Hoderatar r2cayQuIated the figures as <br /> previously nuoted by he Finance Board : Chief t20, 206. 00, <br /> Deputy Chief 115 , 870. 00, Sergeant ' s and Patrolmen Q120, 155 , W <br /> At this noinc Mr. Nameyer eroae and ques0oned the contract, <br /> He questioned whe0or or Rot the contract should not have <br /> brought Wore the people for approval � He questioned valet <br /> services, <br /> Town Accountant mutually agreed on these figures wUhnut <br /> monsultstion with the Finance Board . <br /> At this 7nint ths Moderator recapitulated the figures as <br /> Pre-Tausly quoted by the Finance Toard : Chief 120, 200 . 00 , <br /> Deputy Chtef 115 , 870.00 Sergeants and Patrolmen $120, 155 . 00, <br /> Carland : We stand ready to transfer from tha reserve, <br /> fund , if the Police Departmen, are correct-to make up tK <br /> difference , <br /> At this po_in� _-".�)-me_,yer arose and questionK the contract , <br /> ,e otrs�-,2,, Li- n--_r! the r or not the contract should not bove <br /> brought before the people for approval . Ne questioned (valet <br /> services) , in the sum of $250.00. He questioned the fact that <br /> tbare were some chores the Policemen felt they sl-_, t lbe <br /> called upon to do <br /> The Chief of P�Iice rose to answer Mr. Hamwar_ at this <br /> point . He stated Not he did not have an opportunity to finis,r-, <br /> what he was saying previously. He stated that be and tbR Deputy <br /> Chief were in management and were not included in the contract. <br /> He Nated , however , he did have an interest in the contract <br /> because it effectsTepartment . Hs also stated that there <br /> were things the men did thm caused them to be in need VF <br /> extra cars and cleaning for thsir uniforms such as cleaning <br /> of the police crusiers wbich they agreed to do. Himeyer thetn, <br /> started to argue further on the subject but was asked to <br /> relenquish thR floor by the Moderator, <br /> Peter Lawrence : Rose to question tht position of Deputy <br /> Chief. He wanted to know, was this gbwarned by staUtd? <br /> Chief Bingham replied ; We position of Deputy Chief wP3 <br /> requested by him and was approved by the Top& of Selectmen% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.