Laserfiche WebLink
i µ7 Vium iJ <br /> i <br /> Town (J �GZS�2 +P�2 Aann in Board <br /> 16 (ireat .Neck Road'brth <br /> Aashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> noncompliance with regulatory standards. Participating parties shall review proposed development for <br /> consistency with local zoning. The identified proposed agreement would not be consistent with local <br /> bylaw at this time. Municipalities may recommend approval if it is inconsistent with bylaws, provided <br /> such recommendation shall be subject to amendment of Town development bylaws or grant of <br /> appropriate relief to eliminate or excuse such inconsistency. This is why we wouldn't have the Town <br /> Meeting vote on articles prior to ratification of the Development Agreement. <br /> Mr. Phelan noted nothing where all three parties meet. It's a three party agreement don't you think the <br /> three parties should meet at one point? He would like times of their meetings as well and would love to <br /> get a taste of how their conversations go. <br /> Mr. Lehrer said members of Cape Cod Commission would agree, their enabling regulations and <br /> subchapters are imperfect, and if the process that he just laid out is not captured within these <br /> regulations, we can open a dialogue. He will get the meeting times. <br /> Ms. Waygan said you can make the bylaw part of the Development Agreement and it all goes to Town <br /> Meeting as one packet. Then the residents are looking at it all together so judgement can be made. <br /> She would have asked for the Board to write a letter as that that was the pathway she would have <br /> used. <br /> Mr. Lehrer acknowledged he was a proponent of that process and suggested it at the beginning, but it <br /> is up to the applicant. The applicant has two options to propose, opted for this pathway, and doesn't <br /> think the Board is out of its bounds to modify this schedule. From a staff perspective, Mr. Lehrer thinks <br /> the goal will be not when to submit or why to submit, but should be to produce a technically functional <br /> document that achieves desired effect in the built environment, and if we are not there then the Board <br /> will make that decision. We need to thoughtfully consider what's been proposed with the effort of <br /> complying with everything the Board has discussed. <br /> Mr. Phelan wants to continue with these meetings, he needs to digest this and has more questions and <br /> wants to review zoning. <br /> BOARD MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> Cape Cod Commission Ended its comment period on climate action plan, should <br /> get published soon. <br /> Community Preservation Committee Meeting will be held third or fourth Thursday of the month, <br /> only meet if there is an agenda item or proposal, will share. <br /> Design Review No meeting <br /> Plan Review Nothing since last report. <br /> Environmental Oversight Committee No meeting <br /> Historic District Commission No meeting <br /> Military Civilian Advisory Council No meeting <br /> 17 <br />