Laserfiche WebLink
otivn o asFi Pee `�Cannin Board' <br /> iG Great Neck, Road North <br /> .'Mashpee, Nassachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Lehrer elaborated the Public Hearing notice will reflect there will be no deliberations, open Public <br /> Hearing where the Planning Board makes a referral pursuant to requirements and waits for the Cape <br /> Cod Commission to send it back to Planning Board for local review after theirs. <br /> Discuss and formulate questions relative to the proposed Community Activity Center Overlay <br /> District in preparation for the topical meetings focused on Density/Height, Neighborhood <br /> Design including setbacks and lot coverage requirements <br /> Chairman Fulone had asked to put this on the agenda, as the meeting on the 21 St with Cape Cod <br /> Commission and Mashpee Commons will be heavy. He is hoping everyone can read through the <br /> zoning proposal so a series of questions can be delivered to the Commons in advance for a most <br /> productive meeting. Questions will absolutely arise during the meeting, but this will guide conversation. <br /> Mr. Phelan suggested their individual questions be sent to the Town Planner so there is no overlap. <br /> Mr. Fulone wants questions be sent to Mr. Lehrer by Friday, as they informed the Commons they want <br /> the presentation the following Friday before the meeting of 21 st, if the Commons can have the <br /> questions by Tuesday, they will have a chance to respond or incorporate into their presentation. <br /> Ms. Waygan was under the impression it was just an educational meeting on the 21 St not getting into <br /> the bylaw. She sought agreement with Mr. Balzarini, who agreed, she went on to say she thought it <br /> would be updated on the website and it would be about these concepts, but not about the bylaw. Ms. <br /> Waygan mentioned Ms. Cox had suggested this as there is no regulating plan or guide book. <br /> Mr. Lehrer's understanding with wanting to add to the agenda, was yes it is an educational session, but <br /> the goal is to understand how the proposed dimensional criteria applies to the urban design principals, <br /> why they are what they are. The Board needs to understand what's being proposed, but also in the <br /> context of what was presented in the draft Community Activity Center Overlay District. The questions <br /> he submitted were about methodology for density, why 0 foot setbacks in the core, or why lot coverage <br /> percentages?Without getting into details they need to relate to the dimensional criteria as proposed. <br /> That was his understanding. <br /> Mr. Fulone expects the presentation on the 21 st to be educational in the context of what their plan is, <br /> and a piece of that is the zoning bylaw. We have the ability to direct the conversation to answer our <br /> specific questions relative to their proposed plan. <br /> Ms. Waygan noted they don't have any of these visuals and no regulating plan. Ms. Cox said we would <br /> put the bylaw on hold. She has a million questions about the bylaw she has not expressed yet because <br /> she doesn't have the regulating plan or design guide. She said Ms. Cox offered to stop talking about <br /> the bylaw and do an educational piece. She would like to know what's going on. This is all going around <br /> and around, back and forth. Ms. Waygan thinks they should stop talking about the bylaw until they have <br /> the regulating plan. If the Board doesn't put their foot down and say no to this applicant, who doesn't <br /> 2 <br />