Laserfiche WebLink
" vrrrrrr fa <br /> NTown otMasdvee Aanninq Board- <br /> '•...,(E721J11A4T� <br /> c <br /> 16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br /> :Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> liberal about guidelines, and will continue to be as this is a high interest topic. Maintain respect, courtesy, <br /> and kindness. Disruptive and disrespectful behavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave, <br /> as well as those who encourage outbursts. He is reminding folks check into the facts, and steer clear of <br /> misinformation. Go to the Town website and Planning Department, as everything has been posted and <br /> every presentation is available. There is a lot of information on the Cape Cod Commission and Mashpee <br /> Commons websites as well. That is where real facts can be obtained. The Planning Board has been <br /> tasked to be fair and unbiased representatives that respectively debate facts and ultimately propose the <br /> best plan forthe community.The entire community deserves nothing less. <br /> Ms. Waygan was not in consensus to not hold Public Comment on June 21St <br /> Ms. Waygan went to the Board of Selectman because of the request she had made of the Commission <br /> on June 20th at the joint meeting. There had been a request to the Commission, a public records request, <br /> by the Chair of the Select Board. She forwarded materials to Ms. Waygan and was supposed to forward <br /> them to the Planning Board and to add to the website. The traffic study is here, she is noting it is a <br /> memorandum. There are more documents that are not included. <br /> Mr. Lehrer said the traffic study was only in the packet, and the additional documents were sent via e- <br /> mail and that's why just the traffic study is in there. <br /> Ms. Waygan noted it's a memo regarding parameters for the traffic study. The numbers don't add up <br /> right. <br /> Mr. Lehrer is perceiving the inconsistency, which is the purpose of the Development Agreement. We <br /> don't have a site plan with specific buildings, by way of the DA process, and we need to set various <br /> thresholds, where additional studies will be performed. Eventually we will begin to build thresholds for <br /> neighborhoods, at this stage there needs to be a starting point for the purposes of study, so they had to <br /> start somewhere. He will invite the Commons to elaborate on this as well. It is his understanding why the <br /> figures are what they are based on his professional knowledge. <br /> Ms. Waygan wants to know if the Commission accepted this memo?The numbers are way off. <br /> Mr. Lehrer said he does not know, his hope would be the Commission will respond in time. <br /> Ms.Waygan wants to ask the Commission now, as there are equipment's around Town now. This memo <br /> was written at a time when the square footages were different. She doesn't want the applicant to pay for <br /> a traffic study that they will have to redo. This is dated January 2021. We should find out if the CCC <br /> accepted the parameters. <br /> Mr. Balzarini says these numbers are small, then it makes it seem like it won't be bad with traffic. <br /> Ms. Waygan needs to contact the Cape Cod Commission and find out if this parameter was accepted <br /> and ask why the number is so different than ours. If we are going to have a bylaw we need to make sure <br /> the traffic study is done forthat number of units and square footage. <br /> 3 <br />