Laserfiche WebLink
concerns on the project on 151. If we need to go under the road, that's not a problem. <br /> There's no need to even have this on the table, we will not disrupt the State's repaving of <br /> the road. I'd like to leave point on the table and I'd like the Chair to stop dominating the <br /> conversation with a no-win situation. We should settle these issues on the side. The <br /> Town has made their position clear, this is not a debating society. I'm ready for the next <br /> agenda item. <br /> Ms. Malone said she agrees with Mr. Lyons that we should not address these issues like <br /> this here tonight, but I think the memo and everyone's remarks all point to the fact that <br /> we don't have a modus operandi that we all agree on. We never had a conversation <br /> about how things would change with a staff person regarding roles, responsibilities, <br /> communication, etc...I don't think we can proceed effectively until we do have that <br /> conversation. We have to find a way to communicate effectively. <br /> Mr. Fudala said this email came out of nowhere, with no conversation or explanation to <br /> the Commission, which doesn't get us anywhere. The issue on the agenda is that email <br /> regarding amendment #3. Andy Gottlieb asked what the Commission's collective desire <br /> on how that information is going to flow so that as staff member, he has a fair shot at <br /> succeeding meeting your expectations as a body and meet the expectations of his hiring <br /> body? How do things get resolved in a timely matter if you only meet once a month? We <br /> are now trying to run large project with deadlines. We can't wait until once a month or <br /> we'll miss deadlines. Mr. Fudala suggested if Chris has an issue he should sent it to all of <br /> the Commissioners and GHD and the Town Manager. This way everyone knows what's <br /> going on. If we need to call a special meeting, then fine. Andy Gottlieb said if not <br /> resolved in a clear and workable manner this issue is going to come back and bite us <br /> collectively on making final decisions on the package on Phase 1. <br /> Mr. Dunn said we're talking about water under the bridge, let's set up a process where <br /> we move forward with our communications so we can have productive meetings. If we <br /> have to come in more than once a month I'm all for it. Let's set up a procedure. <br /> Mr. Rapacz said he values the fact that we have a staff resource along with the members <br /> of the commission. We should take advantage of this. He will be looking for Mr. <br /> Gallagher's comments for anything that has to do with engineering. Ms. Malone agreed. <br /> Chris Gallagher said we have to develop what his role is between the Commission and his <br /> boss, the Town Manager. I can help the Town, but we're trying to define the role now. <br /> Mr. Fudala said we should have a conversation with the Town Manager. <br /> All present agreed that Contract #3 didn't need to be done now and that it would be put <br /> off until the Fall, after the Phase 1 bidding etc. is done. <br /> WP79 Groundwater Discharge Permit Application status (this is the second application in <br /> the permitting process) <br /> Anastasia Rudenko the second part of the application is under DEP review and they will <br /> have initial comments next week. We've also given them a preliminary 75% copy of the <br /> drawing so they can give us preliminary comments as we prepare the SRF application. <br />