My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/18/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
02/18/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2021 5:01:27 PM
Creation date
9/1/2021 3:03:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio, (yes); Veronica Warden (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). VOTE: <br /> Unanimous <br /> 2. Review and approval of expense warrants. It was understood that expense warrants would have <br /> to be signed outside of the meeting, due to there being no Board members physically present., <br /> 3. Review of appeal of Title V violation — 47 Fox Hill Road, Kenneth Dugal. Mr. Harrington <br /> commented that, after several calls from realtors and potential buyers, on November 24, 2020" <br /> an order letter was sent to the owner of 47 Fox Hill Road requesting access to confirm the legal <br /> number of bedrooms in the dwelling. The advertised listing sheet stated two bedrooms were in <br /> the dwelling,and pictures revealed three potential bedrooms. The 2002 septic permit states that <br /> a one bedroom is allowed. On December 10, 2020, the owner allowed the Health Agent and <br /> Assistant Health Agent access to perform an inspection. A copy of the inspection form was <br /> provided to the owner. On February 3. 2021,, an order letter, including the violation of Title V, <br /> was sent to the owner. This hearing is an appeal of that violation and order to abate the number <br /> of bedrooms in the dwelling. <br /> At the inspection, possible abatement actions were discussed. They included removal of walls to <br /> meet the six-foot opening requirement or removal of the heat from the rooms. The owner is an <br /> HVAC contractor and thought removal of the heat would be a less costly option., rather than taking <br /> down wails. Mr. Harrington stated that initially he was amenable to that option,, but reversed his <br /> opinion due to the way the housing code is worded,and after consulting with Chair Baumgaertel. <br /> On February 11, 2021, Mr. Harrington spoke with Parke Madden, the realtor for the buyer. He <br /> explained to Mr. Madden that, if the buyers were willing to purchase the property and bring it <br /> into compliance, the Board may utilize an enforceable agreement to allow that. Mr. Harrington <br /> commented that the owner has been very cooperative and forthright in his efforts to resolve the <br /> s ituation.I <br /> Ken Dugal,the property owner, introduced himself for the record. He stated that he knew about <br /> deed restriction when purchasing the house. He said he understands everything that has been <br /> explained to him about bringing the property into compliance,and what it would take to turn the <br /> house into a conforming two or even three-bedroom home. He indicated that he would have <br /> liked to avoid a full overhaul of the house, but understands why removal of the heat was rejected <br /> as an option. Mr. Dugal proposed removing the doors to the bedrooms, wrapping the openings <br /> to both upstairs bedrooms in plaster, and moving the light switches to the exterior of the rooms. <br /> Ms.Warden commented that the Board cannot be less strict than Title V and, if the property has <br /> a bedroom restriction, the Board would not be able to approve his proposal. She suggested <br /> putting a six-foot cas'ed opening on the downstairs bedroom, and making the two upstairs <br /> bedrooms into one master suite. <br /> Mr. Harrington noted that the property fallsjust short of the lot size required to use denitrification <br /> to get the second bedroom. Chair Baumgaertel agreed that, with a quarter-acre lot, it would <br /> require a combination of denitrification and a Nitrogen Aggregation Plan to get additional <br /> bedrooms. He commented that a six-foot cased opening has always been the requirement for <br /> eliminating privacy and, as the Health Agent pointed o�ut, it would be a violation of the state <br /> Sanitary Code to not have portions of the livable space heated. He also suggested opening up the <br /> downstairs bedroom, and acquiring credit land for the two upstairs bedrooms. Board members <br /> felt that all the options had been presented, and Mr. Dugal confirmed his understanding of those <br /> options. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.