My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/04/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
03/04/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2021 5:02:09 PM
Creation date
9/1/2021 3:03:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/04/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
However., if the state did get an odor complaint, an official would be sent out to the site to <br /> investigate. If an odor exists,the state official will give the operator a timeframe in which it must <br /> be corrected. It would be different if there was a potential health risk to employees or the <br /> community. Mr. Harrington commented that he had requested calculations on the discharge <br /> from the main vent because there was a claim that discharge would reach 90',where it would be <br /> diluted. Attorney Goudreau responded that they had no problem providing those calculations <br /> prior to issuance of a permit. He stressed that they want to be a good partner with the Town and <br /> community. <br /> Frank Zaino, who is in charge of engineering for Aspen Blue, introduced himself for the record. <br /> He stated that a response plan had already been created for any odor complaint. <br /> In response to questions regarding the air chillers, Mr. Harrington commented that the chillers <br /> run 24/7 and would be located on the residential corner of the building, so there would need to <br /> be some sound protection with them. DEP had explained to Mr. Harrington that there are control <br /> measures, such as sound attenuating material and/or fencing, which would need to be used for <br /> noise mitigation. Mr. Zaino confirmed that the chillers are a motor, so they were prepared to <br /> employ methods to mitigate any environmental impact from the vibration, but also to maintain <br /> the lifespan of the equipment. <br /> Ms. Warden asked about floor drains, and Mr. Harrington noted that there are none currently in <br /> the building, but they will be installed. Chair Baumgaertel asked if the existing septic system is <br /> adequately sized for this type of business.,and Mr. Harrington answered in the affirmative,noting <br /> that there would be a minimal number of employees on site. Mr. Harrington also noted that a <br /> contract is required for hauling waste from the tight tank to a treatment plant, but it does not <br /> have to be hauled to a specialized type of waste facility. Attorney Goudreau stated that <br /> everything that moves through the system is wastewater compatible. <br /> Ms. Warden proposed granting the cultivation permit with several stipulations, including that <br /> floor drains are installed, and a waste removal contract is provided per tight tank requirements. <br /> She was of the opinion that the Board should have the opportunity to review any odor or noise <br /> complaints associated with the operation of the facility. Chair Baumgaertel noted that the state <br /> has not yet finished its review of the plan;therefore,anything the Board saw fit to approve would <br /> be contingent upon approval from the state. <br /> Attorney Goudreau expressed concern that DEP may not issue an opinion about air quality for <br /> several years,and asked if the Board could put a deadline of some sort on that,,so as not to impede <br /> progress on the project. Mr. Harrington recommended giving DEP an opportunity to review, as <br /> they are the state enforcement agency for air quality. Chair Baumgaertel agreed that DEP's <br /> opinion was valuable,as members of the Board are not air quality experts. It is important to check <br /> all the boxes so, if there is ever an odor complaint, no one can come back and say the Board of <br /> Health did not do due diligence. <br /> Board members agreed that it would be best to continue an ultimate decision on the matter to <br /> the next meeting and, in the meantime,authorize the Health Agent to follow up with DEP on the <br /> status of their review of the odor mitigation plan. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion,Veronica Warden moved to continue the matter <br /> of the Marijuana Cultivation Permit application for Aspen Blue LLC to the next scheduled meeting. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.