My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/14/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
09/14/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2021 5:00:28 PM
Creation date
10/15/2021 1:46:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� 1 <br /> Y' 1own of Alas by e e Planning B,_ oard <br /> 16 Great.Neck Road North <br /> Nashpee, Nassachusetts 02649 <br /> There was an opportunity for public comment specific to this petition. <br /> MOTION <br /> Mr. Balzarini made a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. Callahan seconded. All in favor. <br /> MOTION <br /> Mr. Balzarini made a motion to accept the plans as shown with conditions there will be revised <br /> plans submitted at a later date. Seconded by Mr. Phelan. All in favor. <br /> Mr. Lehrer will prepare a draft decision and provide to Ms. Cox for review and will return to the Board <br /> for signatures as well. <br /> APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED <br /> Applicant: Fain Gildea <br /> Location: #22 and #26 Oyster Way (Map 89 Parcels 77 and 75 respectively) <br /> Request: Purpose of the ANR is to show that there is adequate access to the <br /> parcels from Oyster Way and that there is 150' of frontage along River <br /> Road. <br /> Mr. Lehrer noted these are two lots in Sandalwood. They are still vacant because the original <br /> subdivision gave all of the frontage for 22 and 26 to adjacent properties, with no frontage on the cul-de- <br /> sac. Their frontage was designed to be on River Rd., which is a 40ft. public way unimproved. The Town <br /> took a portion, about 300 ft., from the boundary of 26 Oyster Way. He drove a portion of the road with <br /> Mr. Phelan. ANR requires the Board to find there is frontage on a public way, which there is on River <br /> Road, and access to the lot is adequate. By definition it requires the street be approved by Planning <br /> Board or by a street founded by the Planning Board to have adequate access to abutting property. <br /> The standard for endorsing ANR is River Road of suitable width, grade, and construction for the <br /> passing of a car. Basically, can you drive a car down it? It is narrow, about 10-12 feet, there is one <br /> section that is washed out and creates a topographical challenge if you go past 26 and towards 22. In <br /> his opinion, it is entitled for an endorsement under the subdivision control law as ANR. An endorsement <br /> does not guarantee building rights for the project. It shows adequate frontage on River Road, River <br /> Road is of adequate width for a passing of a vehicle, and it has access to Oyster Way. The adjacent <br /> property owners with similar frontage issues, they got a variance for frontage from Board of Appeal. <br /> This is the regulatory pathway, where the Planning Board can make findings for access and then <br /> building permits can be achieved. Recommendation is entitled to ANR endorsement. <br /> Mr. Balzarini asked they are looking for 150 ft. on each lot, not looking to make it a buildable lot. <br /> Mr. Lehrer stated these lots are grandfathered from 1973, with intention of using River Road as primary <br /> frontage, it was never improved. Endorsement would put the property owner in a position to get a <br /> building permit. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.