Laserfiche WebLink
the pond. Joe Onorato said if this is approved tonight, they plan to do the surveys within <br /> the ten day waiting period. <br /> Rob Garf asked what will be done to mitigate this happening again. Agent said the goal is <br /> to eradicate this by whatever means necessary. Public outreach and communication is key <br /> to that, along with signage at the ponds. <br /> Rob Garf asked about getting equipment at the ramp, Agent said that it's State run,we <br /> would need authorization, making changes would start with concerned citizens contacting <br /> the State. <br /> Jack Mates from 53 Hoophole Road, made public comment thanking the Conservation <br /> Department forjumping on eradicating this so quickly,and he encourages the approval of <br /> this plan. <br /> Ms. Zollo asked if we could contact the John's Ponds homeowners association about <br /> signage. She also suggested we be proactive with getting signage at all ramps in Town. <br /> Assistant Agent asked if this infestation is prevalent in other parts of the Cape, Joe <br /> 0norato said yes, nothing specific off the top of his head, but it's all over the place on <br /> Cape. <br /> Mr.Sweet motioned to close and issue with the conditions from Natural Heritage <br /> and Native Species. <br /> Mr.Dalton seconded the motion. <br /> Vote: 5-0-0 <br /> Roll Call Vote: <br /> Ms.Zollo; yes <br /> Mr.Colombo; yes <br /> Mr.Sweet; yes <br /> Mr.Dalton; yes <br /> Mr.Smith; yes <br /> In favor,5; Opposed, 0; Abstentions, 0 <br /> 6:03 36 Summersea LLC,36 Summersea Road. Proposed demolition and reconstruction of NOI <br /> single-family homewith associated landscaping and hardscaping modifications, septic <br /> system upgrade, and mitigation plantings. Representative: Sweetser Engineering. <br /> Continued from 8126, 919 for submittal of landscape plan <br /> Joe Anastos, the homeowner, presented plans. <br /> Agent said all the missing details from the previous hearing have been provided in this <br /> updated plan. The mitigation has a good mix of species. Meets performance standards. <br /> The last comment is that we noticed a total of 9 trees cut, which resulted in an enforcement <br /> order. It's a significant level of violation. Property owner said he was unaware of any <br /> cutting, however, based on our experience, the cuttings appear to have been done within <br /> the last year and the current owner is responsible. If this is approved, we recommend a <br /> condition of requiring substantial compliance with the enforcement order in order for any <br /> commencement of work to proceed, including demolition of existing home and construction <br /> of a new home. At a minimum,a mitigation plan should be presented and approved by the <br /> Commission. This violation needs to be dealt with sooner rather than later. The <br /> homeowner has engaged with a wetlands consultant. Recommends a close and issue with <br /> the condition mentioned. <br /> Joe Anastos commented that he did not clear those trees and finds it disgusting that it was <br /> done. He purchased the property at the end of May,and has pictures on his phone that he <br /> took in June. He sold the property and needs to have the house completely done by <br /> December of 2022. "1 told the Agent I did not remove the trees, but was told as the <br /> homeowner I am responsible. I don't think it's fair that I can't start the project until <br /> restoration is done. The new owner shouldn't be saddled with the 3 year monitoring <br />