My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/27/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
05/27/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 3:38:12 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:59:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
05/27/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Robert L. and Denise L. Archila <br /> 12 Pine Ridge Road, 30, 32, and 36 Monomoscoy Road West <br /> Assessor's Map 114 Parcels 79, 80, 81, and 82 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2015-15 <br /> • not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming <br /> structure or use to the neighborhood, <br /> • and, that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks <br /> as may be required. <br /> Although said Finding shall not constitute a Special Permit as defined by the <br /> General laws and this By-law, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures <br /> specified in the General Laws for Special Permits in processing requests for such Findings. <br /> Per Town Counsel: Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for a Finding of Fact Cannot <br /> involve a Variance in the Decision/Finding of Fact. No such thing as "use variance". The <br /> Decision must be rendered in two separate statements/decisions if a Variance or Special <br /> Permit is involved along with a Written Finding. <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. The proposal will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non- <br /> conforming structure or use to the neighborhood. <br /> 2. The proposal will be an improvement to the lot and is similar in size and character <br /> to other existing structures in the neighborhood. <br /> 3. The proposed dwelling, based upon the plans submitted to the Board, will be <br /> consistent with applicable State and Town statues, regulations, bylaws and plans, <br /> complies with the dimensional requirements applicable to the lot under current <br /> provisions of §174-31 (Land Space Requirements Table Footnotes) #18 of the <br /> Popponesset Overly District, or for lots which have been developed pursuant to <br /> §174-21, complies with such requirements as were applicable to initial construction <br /> of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21 Nonconforming lots. <br /> 4. Construction of the dwelling is contingent upon Board of Health final approval. <br /> 5. Construction of the dwelling will conform to current building code requirements. <br /> 6. There is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks as may be <br /> required. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.