My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/09/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
09/09/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 3:49:23 PM
Creation date
1/14/2022 1:27:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
09/09/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Richard J. Lawless, Jr. and E. Ranney Lawless <br /> 161 Daniels Island Road (Map 105 Parcel 271) <br /> Mashpee,MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2015-35 <br /> Currently there's a 40 foot setback requirement; the home sits 11.8 feet off the <br /> southeasterly boundary line that it shares with lot 8, and requires 15 feet. It does have a <br /> conforming side yard setback of 3 feet on the northwesterly side of the structure. It is also <br /> non-conforming given its proximity to the wetland resource area retaining wall. The deck <br /> sits about 12.1 feet from the top of the bulkhead wall. <br /> As shown on the plan, the lot is approximately 11,300 square feet and has 70 feet <br /> of frontage on Daniels Island Road. The building currently is a pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming structure. It sits only 16.5 feet off Daniels Island Road. Currently there's a 40 <br /> foot setback requirement; the home sits 11.8 feet off the southeasterly boundary line that it <br /> shares with lot 8, and requires 15 feet. It does have a conforming side yard setback of 3 <br /> feet on the northwesterly side of the structure. It is also non-conforming given its proximity <br /> to the wetland resource area retaining wall. The deck sits about 12.1 feet from the top of <br /> the bulkhead wall. <br /> The proposal is to build on the existing foundation with the addition of the small <br /> bump-out on the westerly side of the structure. This building was built in the `80's and has <br /> a very small kitchen area, and one bathroom on the first floor in the master suite which is <br /> not easily accessible. There is one bedroom on the first floor, and two bedrooms on the <br /> second floor. These new additions will create an easier accessible bathroom. The lot <br /> coverage is currently 2,760 sq. ft. which represents 24.42% lot coverage. The proposal is <br /> for 2,750 sq. ft. (10 square feet less than current conditions), or 24.33% lot coverage. This <br /> relief can be granted which permits alterations and changes to pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming structures. <br /> Mr. Goldstein asked if the cantilever over the garage is the same footprint that <br /> currently exists. Mr. Capone said; "yes". Ron said the plot plan depicts the flood elevation <br /> as"AE EL 13",but on the existing house,the first floor elevation shows 12.7'. Mr. Capone <br /> said he is raising the foundation 1'-4", and will be slightly over 13 ft. Mr. Bonvie and Mr. <br /> Blaisdell said the plan should be corrected. Mr. Furbush wants an updated plan. Mr. <br /> Goldstein said it will also change the roof. Mr. Capone said the height of the building is <br /> accurate on the plan. <br /> Mr. Bonvie read the Inspection Department comments into the record; "The area is <br /> zoned R3 and is in the Pre-contact Archaeology Sensitivity area — listed as "Moderate <br /> Sensitivity". This project is also within the AE Flood Zone. All work shall conform to the <br /> MA State Building Code requirements for construction within an AE Flood Zone. The <br /> applicant is seeking a Written Finding under Article V §174-17 to determine if the removal <br /> of an existing home,but keeping the original foundation which is to be used to reconstruct <br /> a new home on said foundation would be more non-conforming. The applicant is also <br /> looking to add two (2) additions onto the property. Both of these additions appear to be <br /> c closer than 50 feet to the salt marsh located to the rear of the property. This may be <br /> violation of§174-3 —Setback from water and wetlands. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.