Laserfiche WebLink
Charlie stated that his inspection showed that everything <br /> in order. <br /> Judy made a motion to release the covenant of lots <br /> 2, 3, 4,5, 6 ,7 ,and 8. Louise seconded the motion. All Board <br /> { =_ members were in favor. <br /> w=^ Mr. Kevin Kirrane, Notary Public, notarized all the <br /> necessary paperwork. <br /> Continuation of Public Hearings <br /> `-{ Applicant: Merganser Realty Trust <br /> `-- Location: "Turner Road" 300 feet north of Falmouth Town t <br /> 3 <br /> 1. <br /> Line. <br /> a= Request: Continuation of Public hearing to review the <br /> :7 Definitive Plan for a 51-lot subdivision. Def .. <br /> filed 12/5/88 . Mar. 4 deadline has been <br /> extended by letter to A ril 26. New letter <br /> D <br /> .._ .: extending to May 19, 1989. To review access <br /> problem. <br /> Mr. Donald Angus, Attorney for Merganser Realty Trust was ; <br /> present. He stated that they have completed their <br /> presentation. Their engineers were present if there were <br /> any additional questions from the Board. <br /> I <br /> Charlie had reviewed the plans . He stated, that he still had <br /> a question on how the roadway off of Bogg River Bend would <br /> sr; be done- the cross section, grading etc. There were other <br /> minor problems within the subdivision which would be simple <br /> to rectify. <br /> Tony asked Tom if he had any additional comments on the <br /> traffic report. <br /> Tom said he did not, but stated that the report did not <br /> address the issue they were most concerned about which was <br /> safety. It was mainly a capacity analysis report. <br /> Tony asked Lee if he had any further input on the water <br /> quality report. <br /> He stated that the contribution under full buildout is in <br /> excess of the Mashpee standard, and the figures should be. <br /> reduced. He cautioned that the calculations were based ail 3 <br /> persons per dwelling, and it might be more appropriate to ' <br /> place an overall limit on number of persons in subdivision. <br /> i <br /> Tony explained to the applicant that the Board reviewed a <br /> very similar situation with the Greenbriar Development- <br /> .. , <br /> same access , relationship to Childs River East, traffic <br /> impact and safety, water quality and impact an Falmouth <br /> water supply. It is a very similar situation in impact, <br /> only with different intensity in use of the land. This <br /> subdivision also carries the question of filing. The Board <br /> does not have any other questions regarding those issues. <br /> - 3 - <br />