05/17/1989 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

k Tony asked Mr. Angus if he had anything further to say? Mr. Angus stated that he 'wanted to reinforce if there were any other issues or question from the Board, all the consulting engineers were present. Tina Kokenhower stated that the water Quality Report used the specifics of the Mashpee bylaw for buildout analysis as well as an alternative method but believe the alternative was much more up to date and defensible. They did do both : calculations but support the alternative. Louise stated that given Lee's comments on the potential greater density of people, it seems to argue in favor of using more conservative, more protective figures . a i ,1 Tina stated that whenever possible they moved the septic systems outside of the zone of contribution, so some mitigation was performed. Mr. Scully, who prepared the traffic report stated that the report included information that the Board requested- ' buildout up to 1994, they checked site distance further down the road, checked speeds on sections of old Barnstable and it did include safety issues. Tony read the DPW's comments (which were submitted in t Feb.1989) . They stated that the subdivision would increase the traffic on old Barnstable Rd. The DPW improvements planed for that road are very minor, some trees will be removed and there will be some widening of the roadway but the layout restricts the improvements which can be done. Even after construction, it is their opinion that the road will still be inadequate to handle increased traffic flora. Public Comment-- Nan Logan stated that as a resident of Childs River East, she wants the Board to be aware that Paderborn Development is seriously misrepresenting the residents association and what their preference would be, comes into play with their responsibility for maintaining the road. Tony explained that they have a deadline in which to act of May 19th. Since there is no other technical input, and Charlie's issues are ones which can normally be solved ' within the 21 day `period, there seems to be no need to >> extend past this evening. The presentation is completed and there are no other .public questions or comments the Board should be able to act on it this evening_ Tony asked if anyone would like to make a motion to approve the definitive subdivision plan which has been submitted. No Board member made such a motion. Tony asked if anyone like to make a motion to deny the i subdivision plan and give an overview of the reasons for denial , which if the motion carries, a detailed list of reasons for denial will be written later in the evening.