02/20/2008 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mr. Rowley further commented on the storm eater and surface treatment complying with current zoning, or Board satisfaction with the New Seabury Special Permit regulations. He has not made any determination in this regard. The Town Planner agreed that the New Seabury Special Permit does not require the current zoning regulations and cannot be mandated. Mr. Bunker agreed to make a notation on the plan indicating that either all the drainage will be contained on the large lot .16 , or the system will be-re-designed to accommodate..additional drainage. The Town Planner suggested a ante be added to the recorded plant regarding the drainage for Lot 1655 in order to require Applicant to return to the Planning Board in the event circumstances change requiring said note to be removed. Mr. Bunker commented on the.likelihood that any drainage/design on this site would be directed towards Nantucket Sound. He agreed to the additional note on the plan as suggested by the Town Planner. The Town Planner made reference to lots 5, 6, and 7 prohibiting-the-issuance of building permits until such time a's,the septic systems have been abandoned, be noted on the plan as well. Mr. Rowley suggested a-me hanisrn be agreed upon regarding the existing Shore Drive west street elimination whereby Applicant would be required to return to the Planning Board (reverse) Public Hearing process. Said roadway is to be used as access until such time as the new roadway is constructed. There being no further Board or Staff comment, the Chairman made reference to a letter from Mr. Carr dated February 20, 2008, regarding New Seabury Shore DriveWest Definitive Subdivision. The Chairman then opened the floor to discussion from members of the Public and recognized Kenneth Liartsos,.co-president of the Seaside Homeowners Association. Mr. Liatso read a letter into the record from Earl M- Cate, 12 3 Shore Drive west, 1 lashpee, Massachusetts, dated February 17, 2008, to l iashpee Planning Board. "To Whom It May Concern: I aim writing this letter to express my concern regarding the proposed reconfiguration of Shore Drive west from its current configuration to a new configuration that includes a significant curve in the road around where the Padulla home now stands. At the recent Mashpee Town Planning Board meeting held on February 6, 2008 a representative from New Seabury Properties said it was their desire to move the road to the north so that they could promote "better safety" for the Seaside Association neighborhood. That same representative went on the add that because the neighborhood has a private gate, traffic, in theory, should moue no faster than 20 miles per hour. In reality, the very next morning more than ten vehicles used the roads through Seaside to 3