Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> a <br /> thro ghout the day, as well as creating community. <br /> Statistics show that ?o- of all retail sales occur after <br /> oo p.m. and on weekends . Parking spaces that have been <br /> developed for retail are not being used during the daytime . <br /> This would be the ideal location for office use (9 : 00 a.m. <br /> to . oo P.M. ) . <br /> The current Zoning By-law does not allow a mixed-use <br /> benefit . Parking must be provided for retail, office, or <br /> residential . <br /> Mr. Chace proposed using the East Steeple Street area <br /> as a mixed-use community; as well as working with the <br /> Planning Board in order to gain support to change the <br /> current zoning to allow and encourage mixed-use. <br /> Mr. Storrs stated his desire to attend future Planning <br /> Board Meetings in order to speak further regarding mixed- <br /> use/parking generation proposals, as well as possible three <br /> story buildings . <br /> Mr. Storrs spoke to the- differences between deeded <br /> affordable housing and market affordable housing. There <br /> -are, a numbe-r of .people- -who would be. i-nteres-ted in -Living. in <br /> an apartment above a store in Mashpee Commons . <br /> r. Storrs also addressed the matter of providing a <br /> hotel. He spoke to the tax basis generation for the Town, <br /> while creating a viable hotel in a touri-st economy. <br /> Mr. Storrs explained the concept of residential within <br /> a certified growth- center, being that of a mixed-use zoning <br /> ordinance that would enable residential within a commercial <br /> district, without requiring that it be transferred. <br /> It was the consensus of the Board to continue <br /> discussion in this matter at regularly scheduled Planning <br /> Board Meetings, after the Public Hearings, and to invite <br /> the Cape Cod Comm-iss-ion to attend. <br /> This ratter was scheduled for further discussion on <br /> July 2, 2003, at 8 : 00 p.m. <br /> The Chairman reiterated her preference to pursue the <br /> passibility of a Development Agreement. <br /> Public Comment <br /> 6 <br />