07/28/2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes July 28, 2010 •Mr. Dorsey said that the Petitioner should submit a certified plan showing the exact dimension of the pool, the exact location of the pool equipment and the exact location of the `portable' spa. Mr. Nelson said that the plans should have been available and submitted at the time that the Petition was filed with the Town Clerk. The ZBA office requested the plans on numerous occasions from Mr. Buckley. When Mr. and Mrs. Peltzman came to the ZBA office to review the plans, none were available. Mr. Bonvie asked if the Peltzmans had seen the certified plan. The ZBA office had to call One Pointe Curators again requesting the plan, which was faxed. Mr. Bonvie said that the abutters did not see the certified plan. Mr. Buckley said that he submitted conceptual and landscape plans prior to the meeting. Mr. Reiffarth repeated that the plan must show the exact location of the pool equipment. He expressed concern that the equipment could be placed right next to the pool. Mr. Buckley said that the Decision could be rendered with that stipulation. Mr. Reiffarth reiterated that the plan should show the exact location of the equipment. Mr. Nelson said that the plan should show the exact size of the pool. He asked if the Petitioner had received Board of Health and Conservation Commission approval. Mr. Buckley said that the proposal does not fall within Conservation Commission jurisdiction. Mr. Blaisdell read the memo from Building Commissioner Richard Stevens, which reads: "Olavo Macedo/16 Driftwood Circle: This is a Cluster subdivision and setbacks are 30' from road 15' sides and 20' from rear with 30% lot coverage. The lot is level however there are septic restrictions which could favor granting relief" The Board allowed Mr. Buckley an opportunity to present some options and tried to work with the inconsistent plans. Mr. Bonvie restated that he feels the Board should take the Peltzman's concerns into consideration and that the plan should be more detailed. Mr. Nelson said that one of the plans shows the location of.the deck, which will be 6 feet from the property line. Mr. Nelson said that another plan shows a landscaping plan with shrubbery to be planted, which details do not appear on the certified plan. Mr. Buckley said that the existing fence is five feet with a one -foot lattice top. Mr. Blaisdell said that he was confused because one of the plans shows a deck, but the certified plan does not include the deck. Mr. Buckley said that the word `deck' was handwritten on the plan, but is actually a patio, a coping. He said that this plan is a `conceptual plan'. Several plans are now on file, but are confusing because of the discrepancy between them. Mr. Buckley assured the Board that the pool equipment and the spa will be located next to the garage and not next to the abutter's property line. The Building Department issued a request to the ZBA office concerning ZBA Decisions. Once a favorable Decision has been rendered by the Board, the Building Department would like a copy of the Decision citing the approved plans. The plans should be signed by the Board and should be on •file in the Building Department when Applicants file for building permits. This will allow the Building Department to ensure that construction is done according to an exact plan that has the ZBA's approval. 4