My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/28/2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
07/28/2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2022 1:12:36 PM
Creation date
1/28/2022 1:11:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals <br />Minutes <br />July 28, 2010 <br />•The Board repeated to Mr. Buckley the necessity of submitting a certified plan showing pool <br />dimensions and spa and pool equipment locations. Mr. Buckley said that he's aware of the <br />Peltzman's concerns, but that all he is asking for is a five-foot relief from the sideline. He said that <br />the only jurisdiction that the Board has is on the setback. Mr. Reiffarth repeated again that the <br />dimensions of the pool are missing on the certified plan. Mr. Bonvie said that it is important for the <br />Board to. try to protect the neighbor's interests. Mr. Blaisdell said that the Board must cite a <br />specific plan with details. Mr. Buckley offered to handwrite and sign the.plan with the location of <br />the pool equipment. Mr. Nelson said that the Board is looking for "one plan showing everything <br />that is going to be done", including planting of the shrubbery. Mr. Buckley protested to having to <br />submit a certified plan with shrubbery and said that he has "never had that done." Mr. Nelson said <br />that two sheets could be submitted. Mr. Nelson said that the Building Commissioner also has the <br />option of requesting Design Review of the proposal, which will require all of the proposed <br />landscaping to be submitted on the plan. <br />Mr. Reiffarth questioned the `portable spa'. Mr. Buckley said that the spa is not built into the <br />ground and can be moved around the property. He said that those kinds of spas "are usually around <br />6 x 6 or so or something like that." <br />Mr. Nelson said that the Board will require a revised plan. He advised Mr. Buckley to take the two <br />different plans and ask the Building Commissioner what kinds of details the Building Department <br />would require on the certified plot plan. Mr. Nelson said he is not really interested in the proposed <br />vegetation, but that it does appear on one of the submitted plans. Mr. Reiffarth clarified again that <br />the following details must be shown on the certified plan: pool size, location of the spa and location <br />of the pool equipment, along with proposed landscaping if required by the Building Department. <br />Mr. Nelson made a motion to continue the Petition until August 11, 2010 to allow the Petitioner an <br />opportunity to submit the requested revised plans. Mr. Dorsey seconded the motion. All were in <br />favor. <br />Mashpee Baptist Church: Requests a Finding of Fact under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws <br />for permission to construct an addition to a pre-existing, non -conforming structure on property <br />located in an R-5 zoning district at 27 Great Neck Road North (Map 36 Parcel 6) Mashpee, MA. <br />Sitting: Board Members Robert G. Nelson, William A. Blaisdell, James Reiffarth and John M. <br />Dorsey and Associate Board Member Ronald S. Bonvie. <br />Mr. Paul Ferazzi, contractor for the.project, and Attorney Steven Tessier represented the Petition. <br />Pastor Curtis Frye, Jr. and Mr. Robert McManus were also present. <br />The Board reviewed the plans. Mr. Nelson stated that the proposed addition is actually 5.3" further <br />away from the street than the existing structure. He also said that the 23 x 30 -foot addition is not <br />going to create any problem nor is it more detrimental than what currently exists. Attorney Tessier <br />said that the Church also owns Parcel B, formerly Collins Road, but the two parcels have not been <br />merged. He also said that the pre-existing non -conforming structure does not conform to current <br />zoning as to use and to setbacks. <br />No comments were received from abutters. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.