Laserfiche WebLink
W. <br /> �► e said thing is three to one regarding <br /> slopes Mr. Eldredge ever <br /> � <br /> ` with the exception of Building #39 which is two <br /> � steep grades, <br /> to one. <br /> Mr. Eldredge stated changes Would result in the grade at the <br /> r <br /> basement 40 . 7 . <br /> H e <br /> * back of the Building would be elevation 40, <br /> retaining wall (versoloc) slightly <br /> proposed construction�of a, � �n John <br /> immediately adjacent to the bu�ldz g <br /> lower than the grade imm F Y � � Eldredge <br /> Kuchinski requested a stability analysis, to which Mr.. g <br /> y, Iuc concern ding visibility. <br /> agreed. The Chairman expressedregarding g <br /> .a,,, t; Mr. Eldredge explained the grade change would range from thirty <br /> ' tel forty (eight feet at the highest point) . <br /> .. �, :; two to approximately y <br /> •�' a would also be constructed. <br /> r fence <br /> � the <br /> addressed proposed changes with regard t <br /> ��X �.T� lair. Eldredge add p p been moved <br /> � . The avement has <br /> ' pavement to Buildings #30 and #3 , p <br /> . from the buildings twenty-five feet away from the � screened <br /> away f <br /> � edge of the pavement. <br /> John Kuchinski inquired as <br /> w R in porch to the g p <br /> .a�► *. line;- Mr.. Eldredge responded the buildings would not <br /> G� to the tree li g <br /> '; above the ridge line. The Chairman made reference to <br /> be visible ab his reference for <br /> 4 '' •R�� , hazards. Mr.. Eldredge stated p <br /> s set back/road bozo <br /> F set back. <br /> ► d <br /> Eldredge addressed proposed changes with regardto <br /> g nce to theplan (Kitty Wake <br /> }I garages/pavement. He made reference <br /> - feet for parking in front of <br /> Crescent) depth o f twenty f our p g he <br /> �F , garages. The original proposal was for 20 x 20 f t. garages; <br /> +r3 p g , result in a <br /> .'' proposing 22 x 24 ft. two-bay garages. This would <br /> decrease in the number of garages (fifteen to twelve) . <br /> The <br /> called for 6, a o sq. f t. of garage area; he is <br /> , t original proposal interjected. 3 3'T sq. f t. John Kuchinski Attorney <br /> proposing here would be no increase. Mr.. <br /> . ' Butler had previously stated t <br /> 4.O � Eldredge stated there is to be no increase within the overall <br /> ► , <br /> project. The Chairman asked about preservation of the white <br /> pines (Kitty <br /> Ware Crescent) . Mr. Eldredge made reference to the <br /> plan indicating a smaller area of preservation. John <br /> original ,p � , <br /> . t Kuchinski asked about site distance around the curve area <br /> 1 Kuc f he original 1 an. <br /> # Eldredge made reference to design o tp <br /> indicating his changes within the Snowy Egret Drive area. Mr. <br /> � n he plan shown in green which are <br /> Eldredge indicated the areas o t p' <br /> to remain in a natural' ral state as well as other areas where trees <br /> ,...I may be able to be saved. Mr- Eldredge pointed out certain <br /> proposed contours which are not indicated on the original plan. <br /> Mr. originally proposed used as a <br /> Eldredge stated Building #29 origina p <br /> � g* f our- lex proposed to be a four--plex of approximately the same <br /> dimension. Building <br /> p p � #3 3 previously a f our-plex, proposed to be a <br /> p <br /> '���► �` ``i f our- lex (wider) . Building #34 previously proposed as a four <br /> - <br /> - p - lex ion er Building #32 <br /> . :,, plex, proposed to be a four p ( g, } <br /> t� ryl° �� <br /> o vi us 1 a four- lex, proposed to be, a f our-plex, basically the <br /> I pre o y p p tc <br />' '.' - �'' same footprint. Building #38 previously a four-plea, proposed <br /> A' - be a two- lex. Building #39 previously a four-plex, proposed to <br /> �� p <br /> be a f our-p lex, basically the same footprint. Building #4 0 <br /> . � <br /> -2- <br /> r <br /> s <br />