Laserfiche WebLink
. I <br /> *P.44. + <br /> .� ,u,. <br /> H ; indicated three (3) other owners being in attendance as well . <br /> Mr. Moore referred to the Planning Board Meeting held in <br /> 1992 whereupon Mr. Lincoln stated he would donate the land to <br /> the Town. He further informed the Board of the owners wishes <br /> °�• expressed at the time to be approximately fourteen (14) feet of <br /> F width, two (2) inches of stone dust, and four (4) inches of <br /> '" 01 <br /> gravel to be su f f icient to accommodate an increase in traffic. <br /> �� ''' Mr. Moore maintains this request was agreed to. He stated the <br /> road has been widened out to approximately twelve (12) feet in <br /> some areas, creating "a terrible mess . " He indicated to the <br /> ' reference to the Plan pavement to a crown <br /> Board, while making re e <br /> and approximately one (1) inch of dense mix applied the reaf ter. <br /> Mr. Moore provided a physical sample of the material used <br /> on the road. He further indicated the location of a telephone <br /> pole on the road where the width is twelve (12) f ee t wide; the <br /> p dense mix being approximately eleven (11) feet wide, which poses <br /> a '°m �r ►f a safety issue for the Fire Chief. <br /> I„s <br /> At this point, the Chairman recapped the situation for the <br /> benefit of the Board Members, reading from the letter by Deputy <br /> Fire Chief Hamblin, "went down Amy Brown to see if any recent <br /> improvements. . .dirt road less than twenty (20) feet wide, <br /> thirteen (13) foot clearance overhead, not available in some <br /> areas to go. . .overhanging limbs. In the event of a f ire, would <br /> be able to get one piece of fire apparatus in, but would probably <br /> damage our equipment doing s o. No hydrant. . .would have to lay a <br /> five (5) inch line on the street to approach, tying up what <br /> *i• <br /> little road there is. would request no further building be <br /> allowed until improvements are made to allow fire apparatus. " <br /> till <br /> I;flip ,, Eric Smith provided the original Plan indicating a cross <br /> section of what had originally been agreed to in 1992, which the <br /> Board examined. <br /> -r <br /> The Chairman recalled from memory, the determination that <br /> Amy Brown is a back road; the Applicant and a number of abutters <br /> + ifI requested that it remain so. In negotiations, the additional <br /> clearing of the shoulders for emergency access was agreed upon. <br /> DID-% <br /> _ The Chairman further determined that purportedly, <br /> i specifications and width requests have not been met. <br /> Attorney Karrine indicated he is awaiting instruction from <br /> "litthe consulting Engineer with regard to the specifications; and <br /> further only those specifications approved by the Planning Board <br /> ' s in 1992, are required to be met by the Applicant. <br /> rr <br /> The Chairman found he is in receipt of a letter from the <br /> consulting Engineer. Charles Rowley, in which he states the <br /> I} following: "Completed inspection of construction of Amy Brown, <br /> 1M <br /> 6k as shown on Plan of 1991, latest revision-1992 . Drainage at <br /> ik s� —2— <br /> rAV <br /> dr <br /> y <br /> .hk <br />