Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning 4 <br /> Board of Appeals James H. Crocker, Jr. <br /> V-06-57 <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. the subject property is impacted by wetlands and the circumstances relating to <br /> the shape and topography affect the subject lot and not the district in which it <br /> is located. <br /> 2. without relief the lot could not be used for a residence, the purpose for which <br /> it had been laid out and for which the balance of the undersized lots in the <br /> subdivision were being used; therefore, a literal enforcement of the By-laws <br /> would involve hardship to the Petitioner. <br /> 3. the lot has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the Water District; therefore, relief <br /> may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the By-laws. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the <br /> Petitioner met the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion duly <br /> made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on August 9, 2006 <br /> to grant the Variance requests. The variance is conditioned on site plans from Baxter <br /> Nye Engineering and Surveying of Hyannis, MA, dated April 26, 2006,job number <br /> 2001-120-2, and Design Plans by Cotuit Bay Design of Mashpee, MA, dated April 13, <br /> 2006. <br />