Laserfiche WebLink
• Zoning Board of Appeals <br />Minutes <br />October 24, 2006 <br />7. HELD. Phasing Plan; To include the project description for various <br />phases. To meet market and affordability, language in the special permit <br />would reflect (7) phases of construction in the most logical manner. It was <br />agreed the developer would be allowed flexibility to alter housing while <br />maintaining the comprehensive permit application for 382 housing units. <br />It was suggested that a complete review of the initial and/or previous <br />phase be performed to allow the architect and ZBA Board to conduct <br />respective assessments. In response Special Counsel recommended that a <br />yearly review (non-binding) discussion be held. It was deemed an <br />insubstantial change would not require a formal review. This would grant <br />the architect discretion and flexibility while maintaining the right of the <br />ZBA Board to re -assess the process. Representative examples would be <br />presented to the Board at the next meeting. It was noted the architect may <br />overlap phases for ease of construction. <br />8. HELD. Language modification possibly to read: by adherence to the <br />anolicants' (Jobs -Whiting Neighborhood's) architectural code. <br />• 9. Language Change: the grant of any waivers may cause adverse impacts <br />to local concerns. <br />N. DECISION AND CONDITIONS: <br />2. To fully adhere to the Architectural/Design Code. Wording re: No <br />building permits may be granted unless it is confirmed in writing that the <br />process outlined in the Architectural/Design Code has been adhered to; <br />Language is subject to modification. Question re: Written confirmation, <br />from whom? Code shall also be attached as an exhibit. <br />It shall be a requirement of the applicant to give a copy of the Code to the <br />purchaser. The requirement shall be written into the deed. <br />Regulation: 760 CMR 31.03 to be changed. <br />• <br />