Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />Community Preservation Committee <br />Minutes <br />December 2, 2021 <br />Kimberly Conn <br />Application: Breezy Way Roofs, Siding & Windows: $264,893 (continued) <br />Kyle Moore, Project Manager of the Southeast Regional Capital Assistance Team inspected the <br />building envelope components, windows, siding, trim and roofs, all original to the 1990 building. <br />The roofs and siding are brittle, curling and missing in some areas. The windows are failing and <br />are not energy efficient. <br />The CPA funding request for this project is $264,893. The total estimated cost is $327,393. <br />The Mashpee Housing Authority has $60,000 within their capital plan for this project. <br />In reviewing correspondence from the Department of Housing & Community Development <br />(DHCD) dated May 30, 2013 activities classified as "rehabilitation" are not allowed under the <br />CPA Act. However, "preservation" work on existing community housing resources is allowed. <br />In general, work that protects the housing structure (not residents) from future injury, harm or <br />destruction is permitted under CPA. <br />In moving forward discussions regarding the (2) proposals the projects have become preservation <br />work as a result of neglect. If CPA funding is secured it is hopeful the Mashpee Housing <br />Authority would be on track to preserve and maintain these buildings. Ms. Conn was in <br />agreement and stating the Housing authority is attempting to preserve what they are responsible <br />for to make the buildings safe from destruction. Maintenance activities are not allowed with <br />CPA funding. In the future it is hopeful the Housing Authority would only return to the CPC for <br />funding for increased affordable housing projects. <br />In further considering the two proposals there was concern regarding funding associated to the <br />building envelope and the soft costs associated to the project proposal. <br />There was a question regarding the bid process, if the bid comes in less than the CPA award, <br />unexpended funds are required to be returned to the CPC. If the actual amount received from the <br />CPC is reduced, does that affect the leveraged funding? <br />There is concern the leveraged funding may be reduced and impact funding for the cost of <br />windows, etc. Since this is an emergency repair, the CPC also requested written confirmation <br />from DHCD regarding window replacement compliance and affirming qualified preservation <br />activities appropriate for CPA funding. <br />A possible merger of the two projects was also considered. This may not be desirable under <br />DHCD mandates. <br />