My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/23/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
06/23/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 2:06:12 PM
Creation date
2/10/2022 1:57:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Minutes from Public Hearing on June 23, 2004 <br /> 2 <br /> Seabury. He informed the Board that existing customers take priority over new <br /> construction, then based on demand, new construction plans are considered. Mr. Henchy <br /> • mentioned that developers for Northgate, Woods at Mashpee and Mashpee Commons are <br /> seeking approval through Masss Housing and are still pending at the state level totaling <br /> 700 units. Mr. Regan thanked Mr. Henchy for his imput and asked him to come back at <br /> any time. <br /> Howard Glaser: Requests a Variance under Sections 174-33 and 174-85 of the Zoning <br /> By-laws to vary the distance to the wetlands requirement and vary the distance to the <br /> ACEC in order to build a 3-bedroom house on property located in an R-3 zoning district <br /> at 397 Great Oak Road (Map 126 Parcel 49) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Howard Glaser: Requests a Variance under Sections 174-33 and 174-85 of the Zoning <br /> By-laws to vary the distance to the wetlands requirement and vary the distance to the <br /> ACEC in order to build a 3-bedroom house on property located in an R-3 zoning district <br /> at 403 Great Oak Road (Map 126 Parcel 48) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Sitting: James Regan, Robert Nelson and Marshall Brem. <br /> John-Slavinsky represents the petitioner at this hearing. They were before the Board 30 <br /> days ago and the Board wanted the Building Inspector to research these lots to see if there <br /> were buildable and what the situation was with the history of the lots. Mr. Wheeler <br /> submitted a memo with the previously attempted variances from other parties stating that <br /> in his opinion, there were two buildable lots. In addition to this Mr. Nelson discovers a <br /> discrepancy in the dates on the plans they are reviewing and Mr. Slavinsky says lie will <br /> look into that. Mr. Brem states that he is very concerned about driveways entering onto <br /> Great Oak Road due to the dangerous radius the road curves off at. The Board and Mr. <br /> Slavinsky discuss different areas where the driveway could be laid out. The pavement is <br /> also a problem, since it goes across the front part of the applicants property. Mr. <br /> Slavinsky also informs the Board that the Conservation Commission has approved the <br /> plans. He suggests a meeting with Greg Taylor of the DPW to discuss the driveway <br /> situation. After some discussion of the history of these proposals, Mr. Regan suggests <br /> this be discussed with Town Counsel as to the legal ramifications of the paved roadway <br /> being on Mr. Glaser's property. The Board gives a date of July 28 for a continuance. <br /> Marshall Brem makes a motion to continue the matter until July 28t". Robert Nelson <br /> seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. <br /> Jonathon Yohannan: Requests a Variance from Sections 174-33, 174-85 and 174-86 of <br /> the Zoning By-laws seeking relief from the distance to the wetlands requirement, and <br /> setback to ACEC requirement in order to build a 3-bedroom dwelling on property located <br /> in an R-3 zoning district at 304 Red brook Road (Map 109 Parcel 8) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Sitting: James Regan, Robert Nelson and Marshall Brem. <br /> David Sanicki of Cape & Islands Engineering represents the petitioner at this hearing. <br /> This property in questions is 1.59 acres and lays in the ACEC area. Mr. Sanicki has <br /> outlined a portion of the plans the Board is reviewing to show where his client could <br /> • build a house it no zoning relief was allowed. There would be a small triangle of <br /> available space not even large enough for a house. The current zoning requires there to <br /> be a 25' buffer from the ACEC area and 35' (at minimum) from the BV W. If <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.