Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Minutes <br /> 4 July 14, 2004 <br /> Plymouth Savings Bank: Requests a Special Permit from Section 174-54 of the Zoning <br /> By-laws in order to have signage and illumination in a commercial district on property <br /> located in a C-1 zoning district at 6 Shellback Way(Map 81 Parcel 36) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Owner: Charles C. Hajjar Trust, Falmouth Road Trust <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represents Plymouth Savings Bank at this hearing. Also present <br /> is Mr. Louis Kruger, Sr. Vice President of Plymouth Savings Bank. They are seeking a <br /> special permit along with a variance in order to build an addition to the existing bank and <br /> for signage purposes. The very lengthy hearing began with the history of the bank. The <br /> parcel sits at the corner of Shellback Way and Route 28 having 158' of frontage along <br /> Route 28 and 166' along Shellback Way. The parcel consists of approximately 40,000 <br /> square feet and has been developed. There is an existing small banking facility with a <br /> drive-thru window and 17 parking spaces on the site. The Bank sits upon its own lot and <br /> is serviced by its own subsurface sewage disposal system. The applicant is proposing to <br /> build a 1,128 square foot addition to the existing 2,126 square foot building. The <br /> applicant would like to re-locate its drive-thru window and add 5 new parking spots to <br /> accommodate the additional square footage. The present owner of the land is Falmouth <br /> Road Trust, Charles Hajaar Trust and Plymouth Savings Bank leases the property from <br /> them. Additionally, as a result of an agreement with the developer of the Talanian <br /> Commercial Complex directly across the street where Roche Brothers is and to <br /> accommodate the installation of the signal at the intersection of Route 28 and Shellback <br /> Way, the applicant has agreed to eliminate the two access driveways that currently <br /> service the facility on Shellback Way. The applicant will now use existing driveway <br /> accesses to the Deer Crossing Commercial Complex. The applicant is also proposing the <br /> installation of a new Title V System. The parcel is situated in the C-1 zoning district and <br /> is a non-conforming parcel in that it contains less than the required 40,000 square feet. <br /> The structure is non-conforming in that it fails to meet the current 40' rear yard setback. <br /> The parking is non-conforming in that it encroaches upon the currently required 50' <br /> buffer strip along Route 28. Applicant is seeking a variance to further encroach on that <br /> buffer strip (33' reduced to 25') along Route 28. The applicant is proposing to include <br /> landscaping within the buffer to enhance the overall appearance to the site. Applicant <br /> feels they need this encroachment for traffic flow and to accommodate the newly revised <br /> drive-thru window. Applicant suggests he is willing to work with his neighbors to <br /> improve overall traffic problems. They are also seeking to install signage typically <br /> employed by the bank. It would consist of a digital component along with a clock and <br /> temperature reading and they would need this to be internally lit. The Board views the <br /> plans with applicant at length. Mr. Regan and Mr. Nelson discuss the problems with the <br /> entrance near True Value Hardware and how dangerous it is at the moment. Fred <br /> DiMeco who is the Trustee of Deer Crossing Condominiums, voices his concern <br /> regarding the same matter. Deer Crossing has waited for a long time to be able to address <br /> these concerns of traffic pulling out onto Shellback Way while residents have difficulty <br /> negotiating this illegal unauthorized driveway and parking in front of True Value. Many <br /> people park haphazardly to get propane, pulling into the existing parking spots, as they <br /> exist now is a dangerous venture that has resulted in many broken taillights. Mr. DiMeco <br /> submits another plans suggesting alternative entrances and exists and to please work with <br /> the Deer Crossing residents to fix this ill-fated problem. The residents are not opposed <br /> to the bank plans as such; they just want someone to be responsible for the poor traffic <br /> flow that currently exists. Since Mr. Hajjar is on the deed for both the Deer Crossing <br />