06/26/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—June 26, 2002 4 Board of Appeals i Mr. Govoni questioned the issue of water and septic supply to the trailer. Mr. Crowe said �l that the trailer would be tied into the septic system. No comments were received from abutters. !i Mr. Nelson moved to grant a Special Permit under Section 174-25.A.8 to allow for construction of an in-law apartment to a new dwelling on the subject property. The Special Permit is conditioned upon compliance with submitted plans and that the proposal shall not exceed a maximum of 4 bedrooms. Mr. Borgeson seconded. All agreed. Mr. Nelson moved to grant a Special Permit under Section 174-25112 for permission to park and use a trailer for temporary occupancy incidental to the construction of a single-family home. The Special Permit is conditioned upon compliance with the following: 1. that the trailer may be parked on the subject property for a maximum of 60 ! days, such date starting with issue of the building permit and running for 60 days from that date. 2. that at the end of 60-day period, said trailer must be removed from the subject I Vii! property. I 3. that the Petitioner must tie the trailer into the septic system on the property located at 32 Popponesset Avenue. I 4. that the Petitioner must tie the trailer into the Town district water system on the property located at 32 Popponesset Avenue. Mr. Borgeson seconded. All agreed. Renee E. DeDecko—Requests a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the side setback requirements to allow for installation of a shed on I' property located in an R-5 zoning district at 61 Quinaquisset Avenue (Map 68 Parcel 92) Mashpee, MA. Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, Robert G. Nelson and Frederick R. Borgeson. Mr. Regan stepped down and left the room. H Mr. Matthew DeDecko represented the Petitioner, his wife, and stated that he is a builder and wishes to store his equipment in the proposed shed on the subject property. Mr. DeDecko said that a paper road abuts the property on one side and conservation land abuts the property on another side. He stated that the shed would have to be located right g R I' jiili'I up against his house in order to avoid the easement. Mr. DeDecko said that he would prefer to locate the shed three to four feet away from the house to allow for air to circulate. I ! I I' Mr. Govoni strongly suggested that the location of the shed should be outside the easement. Mr. Borgeson said that he could not justify granting a Variance to encroach on the easement. Mr. DeDecko claimed that the road would never be developed and that half of his property lies within the easement. Mr. Guerrera questioned the nature of the r i i