06/26/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—June 26, 2002 5 Board of Appeals ;I hardship. Mr. DeDecko said that the 40-foot paper road that abuts his lot creates the hardship. Mr. Borgeson said that there were plenty of other options to locate the shed and Mr. Nelson suggested moving the location of the shed behind the house. Mr. Borgeson observed that construction of the shed has already been started. Mr. Nelson ! said that he visited the property, which contains a vast amount of area in the back, and said that he preferred to see the shed placed in the back of the house. Mr. Nelson said I� that if the shed is relocated and does not encroach on the easement, the Petitioner `does i not need anything from this Board'. No comments were received from abutters. III Mr. Govoni moved to grant a 15-foot Variance to allow for the corner of the proposed shed to abut the easement line. The Variance is subject t to findings: unusual topography, abutting paper road. The Variance is conditioned upon compliance with the following: p P g: j 1. that the shed must remain a minimum of 15 feet away from the property line. 2. that the proposed shed must not encroach into the easement area. III 3. plan entitled `Plot Plan of Land Located in Mashpee—Mass., Prepared for j Matthew DeDecko, Date: June 12, 2002, Ferreira Associates'. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. I Peter C. & Elizabeth M. Maher—Request a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws to demolish an existing dwelling to allow for construction of a single-family g amity home on property located in an R-3 zoningdistrict at 85 Bluff Avenue-'--- (Map venue (Map 118 Parcel 59) Mashpee, MA. II ii j Peter C. & Elizabeth M. Maher—Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws to vary the front setback requirements to allow for construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 85 Bluff Avenue (Map 118 Parcel 59) Mashpee, MA. �I Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, Robert G. Nelson and Richard T. Guerrera. Mr. Regan stepped down and left the room. j I Mr. David Sanicki of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the Petition and submitted photos of the existing home on the subject property. He said that plans call for I' demolition of the existing home and construction of a new family home on the property. The location of the new dwelling would be 20 feet from the property line, which would be less detrimental than the existing dwelling that is 19.5 feet from the property line. Mr. Sanicki stated that construction and placement of the septic system, which was configured in compliance with Title V requirements, restricts the location of the proposed home. There is no need for a Variance from lot coverage requirements. Ms. Shirley Boutilier, whose mother owns the abutting property at 81 Bluff Avenue, stated that she `loves the plan' even proposal the though ro would block her ocean view. g p P ' She admitted that that the Petitioner is `totally within his rights to do that' and that she would gain 25 feet in the front. Ms. Boutilier reviewed the plans. Mr. Govoni asked if i