Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br /> Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals November 13, 2002 <br /> 5 <br /> discussion ensues regarding what could possibly be reduced. The Board in general does <br /> not like to grant anything over 20% lot coverage. Due to the size of the lot, the Board <br /> agrees to grant the requested permits. Mr. Nelson feels that a new septic system is a <br /> reasonable trade-off for an increase in lot coverage because the lot is so very small. Mr. <br /> Nelson moves to grant a Variance of 9 feet and a Special Permit to conduct the work. <br /> Zella Elizenberry seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. Variance criteria includes, <br /> #1, #2 and#4. Special Permit criteria includes #l, #2, #3, #12. <br /> Comments from abutters include an immediate abutter who is very happy about the ; ! <br /> proposed construction and feels it would be an improvement to the neighborhood and she <br /> would welcome the year-round company. <br /> Mid Cape Construction,Inc. Request a Special Permit under Section 174-25.A.8 of the <br /> I <br /> Zoning By-laws to allow for construction of 2600 square foot in-law apartment on <br /> property located in an R-3 zoning district at 379 Redbrook Road (Map 108 Parcel 29) <br /> Mashpee, MA. j <br /> Sitting: Zella Elizenberry and Marshall Brem and Frederick Borgeson. <br /> Mr. Nelson steps down from this hearing but would like to listen as an interested party. I <br /> Carl Delorme of Mid-Cape Construction, Inc. represents the petitioner Robert and Debra <br /> Tippo in their request for a Special Permit to construct an in-law apartment. Mr. <br /> Delorme informs the Board that a 30 x 26 addition has been constructed and now needs a <br /> Special Permit that Section 174-25.A.8 provides for. The addition meets all requirements <br /> for setbacks, zoning, and the Board of Health and exceeds the required 750 square foot <br /> minimum. There are several people with complaints from the neighborhood Association <br /> with respect to the way the Petitioner went about this construction. They did not I <br /> approach the Association which has strict covenants regarding any kind of two-family I ' <br /> dwelling in Seabrook Village. Mr. Borgeson informs the abutters that the Board of <br /> Appeals governs the zoning for the Town and does not get involved in neighborhood �l <br /> associations. Susan Regan, President of Seabrook Village Association states her <br /> concerns over people in the neighborhood building whatever they want and this property <br /> turning into a rental property. This is not allowed in the covenants that are filed with e <br /> property owner's deeds. Marshall Brem feels Associations are vital to maintaining <br /> the <br /> aesthetics of a neighborhood. Mr. Brem feels that the granting of a Special Permit should <br /> be conditioned upon following all covenants in the neighborhood and complying with <br /> their requests. Mr. Borgeson does not fully agree, however he will go along with it. Mr. <br /> Brem moves to grant the Special Permit as described above to comply with Seabrook <br /> Village Association's rules and requirements and this will also be granted in perpetuity. <br /> Mr.Nelson (from an interested party's standpoint and not a member of the Board) has (' <br /> discussed this "in-law" apartment language, as it does not exist in the rules of Section <br /> 174-28.A.8. It should be referred to as an accessory structure. Frederick Burgeon <br /> seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. Criteria includes all information from the + <br /> Proper section. <br />