01/12/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—January 12, 2000 9 Board of Appeals 3. that no maintenance or servicing(such as, but not limited to, oil change, washing, repairing) of vehicles shall be done on the subject property. 1+� 4. that no signage (other than on the vehicle for sale) advertising sale of vehicles t shall be erected on the subject property. 5. that no cube or box trucks for sale shall beparked on the subject property. 6. that the sale of only full-size vans or vehicles shall be allowed on the subject property. 7. that the Special Permit shall expire one year from the date that the Zoning Board of Appeals has filed it with the Town Clerk. 8. that the applicant must request a renewal of the Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals at least one month before the expiration of the , Special Permit. 9. that the Zoning Board of Appeals shall review the Special Permit for renewal. Mr. Regan seconded. All agreed. John J. &Anne V. Hauss, Sr.—Request a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish an existing structure and build a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 15 Seaview ' Avenue (Map 118 Block 45)Mashpee, MA. 1 John J. &Anne V.Hauss, Sr. —Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws to vary the lot coverage to allow for construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 15 Seaview Avenue (Map 118 Block 45) ! '� Mashpee, MA. w Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, James E. Regan III and Robert G. Nelson. Mr. David Sanicki of Cape &Islands Engineering represented the applicants,who also attended the meeting. Mr. Sanicki referred to the plans and said that a Variance of 1.6% M from the lot coverage requirements is being sought for construction of the new home. �.� No comments were received from abutters. +„ Mr. Regan moved to grant a Variance of 1.6% from the lot coverage requirements, subject to criteria 1, 2, 3, 4 and findings 1, and that the installation of the new septic y k system would be an improvement to the property. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. Mr. Regan moved to grant the Special Permit, subject to criteria/findings: that the kp� installation of the new septic system would be an improvement to the property,that the x! new construction will not be more detrimental than the previous construction, 1, 4, 5, 6. ' Mr. Govoni seconded. All agreed. , Little Neck Realty Trust—Requests a Variance from Section 174-33 of the Zoning By-laws to vary the setback from water and wetlands to allow for construction of a ; single-family home on property located in an S-3 zoning district at 44 Little Neck It1T E �r